| 10:45am | Monday, December 17, 2007 | ||||||
| 20070254 |
Darin G. Frueh, Plaintiff and Appellant v. Melissa A. Frueh, n/k/a Melissa Hoheisel, Defendant and Appellee | ||||||
| Appeal from: | South Central Judicial District, Sheridan County, Judge Robert O. Wefald | ||||||
| Nature of Action: | Child Cust & Support (Div.\other) | ||||||
| Counsel: |
| ||||||
| Issues: | Appellant's Statement of the Issues: 1. Is it error for a trial court to deny an evidentiary hearing wherein: a. The child who is almost 13 has requested the change of custody. b. The child has alleged that the mother's new husband abused him. c. The mother has remarried and the child and new husband are not compatible. 2. If the original custody arrangement was by stipulation of the parties, and the non-custodial parent moves to change custody, is the trial court, in deciding whether or not to grant an evidentiary hearing required to review the entire file and the facts about the parties when addressing the best interests of the child, or is the trial court limited to only those events that occurred since the divorce? Appellee's Statement of the Issues: | ||||||
| Briefs: |
| ||||||
Generated from Supreme Court Docket on 12/31/2007 | |||||||