State v. Schmeets

9:00am Tuesday, June 3, 2008
20070360 State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Jeffrey Schmeets, Defendant and Appellant
Appeal from: South Central Judicial District, Sheridan County, Judge Robert O. Wefald
Nature of Action: Drugs/Contraband
Counsel:

Appellant: Monty Jay Stensland
Appellee: Walter Mathias Lipp , State's Attorney

Issues: Appellant's Statement of the Issues:
I.Whether the Defendant received sufficient notice as to what the State intended to prove at the revocation hearing.
II.Whether the State proved the specific allegations that the Defendant violated the conditions of probation as alleged in the Amended Petitions for Revocation of Probation.
Appellee's Statement of the Issues:
1. Did Schmeets properly preserve his claimed error.
2. If properly preserved was the error obvious.
3. Has the State presented proof of the violation of Allegation 3 by a preponderance of the evidence.
Briefs:
Case Summary
Appellant Brief
Appellee Brief
Listen to recording of oral argument
using RealPlayer Basic,^© a free download.

Go to Docket

Generated from Supreme Court Docket on 07/23/2008