|2:45pm||Monday, June 18, 2012|
Tim Clausnitzer, Plaintiff and Appellant
Tesoro Refining and
Marketing Company, Defendant and Appellee
|Appeal from:||South Central Judicial District, Morton County, Judge Gail H. Hagerty, 30-10-C-00759|
|Nature of Action:||Employer/Employee Dispute|
Appellant's Statement of the Issues:|
I. Whether the district court erred as a matter of law by concluding the term "premises" includes personal property under N.D.C.C. 14-02.4-03?
II. Whether the district court was clearly erroneous to find the record established that Clausnitzer's actions directly conflicted with Tesoro's essential business related interests?
Appellee's Statement of the Issues:
I. Whether the district court correctly concluded that Tesoro's "premises" may include its policy definition of "company premises" for purposes of the North Dakota Human Rights Act.
II. Whether the district court correctly determined that Tim Clausnitzer, by drinking and driving a clearly marked company vehicle with a breath alcohol content over the permissible company threshold, took actions that directly conflicted with Tesoro's essential business related interests.
Generated from Supreme Court Docket on 06/30/2012