|10:05am||Wednesday, November 6, 2013|
Trista Marie Conzemius, Plaintiff, Appellant
Chad Thomas Conzemius, Defendant, Appellee
|Appeal from:||East Central Judicial District, Cass County, Judge Wickham Corwin, 09-2012-DM-00040|
|Nature of Action:||Child Cust & Support (Div.\other)|
Appellant's Statement of the Issues:|
Alcohol Restriction? Should it, at least, have restrained Chad from being under the influence of alcohol during his parenting time?
Expanded Summer Parenting Time? Did the District Court clearly err in: (a) awarding Chad six weeks of expanded summer parenting time; (b) refusing to allow the parties' son to re-testify, after learning his dad didn't exercise four weeks of summer parenting time; and (c) allowing Chad to dictate Trista's summer schedule?
Equitable Distribution Errors? Did the District Court clearly err in its asset and debt distribution by: (a) ignoring the tax impact on the parties' tax-deferred retirement accounts; (b) ignoring Chad's waste and dissipation; and (c) under-valuing the parties' 20% interest in a closely held water-hauling business, Schiele Mobility?
Errors in Child and Spousal Support Findings? Did the District Court clearly err in understating Chad's gross annual income for support purposes?
Spousal Support Errors? Did the District Court clearly err by not awarding Trista spousal support?
Appellee's Statement of the Issues:
1. Did the trial court err in determining the existence of $40,500 of marital assets when there is no personal property, tangible or intangible, that could possibly exist?
2. Did the trial court err in requiring CHAD reimburse TRISTA in the amount of $30,000 of attorney's fees and costs?
Generated from Supreme Court Docket on 11/30/2013