RULE 47.1 CERTIFICATION OF QUESTIONS OF LAW
STATE DISTRICT COURT
Who May Certify Questions of Law Certification of Question of Law by District Court.
(1) Conditions for Certification. Any district court, on its own motion or the motion of any party to a civil or a criminal proceeding, may order certification of a question of law
may submit a question of law under N.D.C.C. § 32-24-01, to the supreme court for final determination through a certification order. when the following conditions are met:
(A) there is a question of law involved in the proceeding that is determinative of the proceeding;
(B) it appears to the district court that there is no controlling precedent in the decisions of the supreme court.
(2) Statement of Question. The district court may require the parties to submit proposed statements of the question of law to be certified and proposed findings of fact. A certification order may contain more than one question.
(3) Ruling by District Court. The district court must rule on the question of law before a certification order may be submitted to the supreme court.
Contents of Certification Order and Supporting Documentation.
(1) Issuance of Order Discretionary. The issuance of a certification order is within the discretion of the district court.
(2) District Court to Act Expeditiously. The district court must act in an expeditious manner in determining whether to certify a question of law and in issuing and forwarding a certification order to the supreme court.
(1) (3) Contents. A certification order must contain: (i) (A) Findings of fact on all facts needed to resolve the question of law relevant to the question certified, showing fully the nature of the controversy in which the question arose. (ii) (B) A question of law formulated in a manner allowing the question to be answered by a yes "yes" or no "no" answer. (iii) (C) The trial district court's answer to each the question.
The certification order may contain a statement of the order and time within which the parties must serve and file their briefs.
(2) (4) Supporting Documentation. The certifying district court shall transmit must forward with the certification order any parts of the record and other documents necessary to answer the certified questions question. The supreme court may require an the original record, or copies of all or any portion of the record, to be forwarded and filed if necessary to answer the certified questions with the certification order.
(5) Proceeding may be Stayed. The district court may stay the proceeding in district court until the question has been answered or otherwise ruled upon by the supreme court.
Procedure in Consideration by Supreme Court.
(1) Supreme Court Has Discretion. The supreme court may refuse to consider a certification order if the court determines the question of law submitted is frivolous or interlocutory in nature, or not dispositive of the issues before the district court.
(2) Procedure in Supreme Court. Unless the district court specifies the order and time within which the briefs must be served and filed, all proceedings, including oral argument, in the supreme court will be governed by these rules.
In supreme court proceedings, the The parties shall retain the same designations in the supreme court as in the certifying district court and the plaintiff will be deemed to be the appellant. The plaintiff in the certifying court shall file a brief with the clerk of the supreme court within the time specified by the trial court. The defendant shall file a brief in response to the brief of the plaintiff within the time specified by the trial court. Any party may request an extension of time pursuant to Rule 26(b), but promptness is required. Oral argument is governed by Rule 34. (d) (3) Fees and Costs. Fees and costs are the same as in civil appeals docketed before the supreme court and must be equally divided by among the parties unless otherwise ordered by the certifying district court orders otherwise in its certification order of certification. The supreme court, upon the motion of any party, may enter an appropriate order with respect to the assessment of fees and costs.
Rule 47.1 was amended, effective January 1, 1979; September 1, 1983; March 1, 1999; .
Certification is discretionary with the trial court, and a certified question need not be answered by the
Supreme Court supreme court. See N.D.C.C. § 32-24-02 paragraphs (b)(1) and (c)(1). Subdivision (a), by reference, contains the requirements of N.D.C.C. § 32-24-01. That statute states questions of law may be certified only if the case in which they arise depends "principally or wholly on the construction of the laws applicable thereto, and such construction or interpretation is vital, or of great moment in the cause."
The certification order may be prepared by the court or the parties
, but it must be transmitted to the Supreme Court by the clerk of the certifying court. See N.D.C.C. § 32-24-04. The questions question of law must first be ruled upon by the certifying court, and any issues of fact necessary for the determination of the questions of law question must also be found by the trial certifying court.
The intent of
subdivision (c) paragraph (b)(2) is to assure that the questions are presented to the Supreme Court supreme court as expeditiously as possible, with little delay in the final hearing and determination of the case.
Technical amendments were made to Rule 47.1, effective March 1, 1999, and the obsolete reference to "county court" was deleted.
Rule 47.1 was amended, effective __________________. The language and organization of the rule were changed to make the rule more easily understood and to make style and terminology consistent throughout the rules.
Effective , Rule 47.1 was amended to include the relevant provisions of N.D.C.C. ch. 32-24. With these amendments, N.D.C.C. §§ 32-24-01, 32-24-02, 32-24-03, and 32-24-04 are superseded.
SOURCES: Joint Procedure Committee Minutes of ; April 30-May 1, 1998, page 11.
CONSIDERED: N.D.C.C. §§ 32-24-01, 32-24-02, 32-24-03, 32-24-04.
SUPERSEDED: N.D.C.C. §§ 32-24-01, 32-24-02, 32-24-03, 32-24-04.
CASES: State v. Lebus, 339 N.W.2d 564 (N.D. 1983); State v. McDowell, 312 N.W.2d 301 (N.D. 1981).