RULE 26.1. FOREIGN LAW DETERMINATION
A Unless otherwise permitted by the court, a party who intends intending to raise an issue concerning the law of any jurisdiction foreign to this state shall give notice thereof, reciting the foreign law, to must provide the court and opposing counsel all parties written notice at least ten days prior to the hearing or trial , unless otherwise permitted by the court. If opposing counsel an opposing party does not reply within five days after receiving the notice, the court may determine the foreign law to be as recited in the notice. In determining the Issues of foreign law are questions of law, but in deciding such issues the court may consider any relevant material or source, including testimony, whether or not submitted by a party or admissible under N.D.R.Crim.P. 26. The court's determination shall be treated as a ruling on a question of law without regard to the North Dakota Rules of Evidence.
Rule 26.1 was amended, effective___________.
Rule 26.1 is intended to furnish the courts with a uniform and effective procedure for raising or determining an issue concerned with the law of a neighboring
State state. The Rule 26.1 is designed to give advance notice to opposing parties, prior to trial, of any reliance upon the law of another State state, in order to avoid the necessity of an adjournment while the opposing attorney is granted time to verify the foreign law. The Rule 26.1 would thus speed up those criminal cases where the settlement of an issue of foreign law is necessary for the resolution of the case.
A ten-day requirement for advance notice of foreign law is established and has been couched in terms which leave the provision for such notice to the discretion of the court. To achieve this result the language "unless otherwise permitted by the court" is included. This language provides the court with discretion in shortening the period if advisable or lengthening it in those situations where the law of a foreign
State state is difficult to ascertain.
Rule 26.1 was amended, effective ______________, in response to the December 1, 2002, revision of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. The language and organization of the rule were changed to make the rule more easily understood and to make style and terminology consistent throughout the rules.
SOURCES: Joint Procedure Committee Minutes of _____________, pages ____; April 24-26, 1973, pages 11-12; October 17-20, 1972, pages 29-30; November 18-20, 1971, pages 10-12 and 18-19; May 6-7, 1971, pages 13-15; Fed.R.Crim.P. 26.1
Wright, Federal Practice and Procedure: Criminal, § 431-432 (1969); 8 Moore's Federal Practice, Chapter 26 (Cipes, 2d Ed. 1970); Proposed Idaho Rules of Criminal Procedure. Proposed Rule 26.1, page 86.
CONSIDERED: N.D.C.C. §§ 31-09-01, 31-09-02, 31-09-04, 31-09-10, 31-10-02, 31-10-03, 31-10-04, 31-10-05.
CROSS REFERENCE: N.D.R.Civ.P. 44.1 (Determination of Foreign Law).