The Gender Fairness Implementation Committee was established by Supreme Court Administrative Order 7 to oversee implementation of recommendations made by the Commission on Gender Fairness in the Courts. It is further charged with monitoring the progress of the judicial branch in eliminating gender bias in the courts.
In its report, the Commission on Gender Fairness in the Courts made 33 recommendations in six categories: professional conduct, jury service, domestic law, domestic violence, criminal law, and judicial system as employer. After completing its initial review and analysis of these recommendations, the Implementation Committee referred certain recommendations to other judicial system committees, or other entities, for consideration. Those referrals are indicated in the following listing of recommendations and the status of actions taken. The Committee also identified recommendations for which additional information, or at least monitoring, is required. These recommendations are reflected under the "Pending" status. Also reflected under the "Pending" status are those recommendations the Committee has identified as requiring development of various education initiatives in a variety of venues. The Committee is continuing its review of the most appropriate methods for pursuing these educational programs.
A. PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT
1. The North Dakota Rules of Professional Responsibility [sic] should be amended to include an explicit prohibition against gender-biased conduct in the courtroom. The Joint Attorney Standards Committee [sic] has previously considered this issue and did not recommend a change in the rules. However, the new findings of the gender fairness survey justify reconsideration of this issue.
Pending. The Joint Committee on Attorney Standards has discussed this recommendation and at its June 8,1999, meeting will review draft amendments to Rule 8.4, Rules of Professional Conduct, relating to the recommendation.
2. A system-wide statement reemphasizing Canon 3(B)(5) and (6) of the North Dakota Code of Judicial Conduct should be issued.
The Implementation Committee has met with the SBAND Executive Director and CLE Coordinator and Director of Judicial Education to discuss possible education approaches.
3. The Commentary to Canon 3(B)(5) and (6) of the North Dakota Code of Judicial Conduct should be expanded (a) to mention examples of prohibited gender-biased conduct that may not be considered "sexual harassment" per se (e.g., terms of endearment, forms of address, or gender stereotypes) and (b) to reference Vitko v. Vitko, 524 N.W.2d 102, 105-06 (N.D. 1994) (Levine, J., concurring) and Johnson v. Johnson, 544 N.W.2d 519 (N.D. 1996) and the duty to intervene.
4. Special efforts should be made to present innovative and appropriate judicial and attorney training and education programs to enhance sensitivity to gender fairness issues. Programs should include specific reference to the complex issues of professionalism and judicial intervention, including when intervention is appropriate and how it should be accomplished.
The Implementation Committee has met with the SBAND Executive Director and CLE Coordinator and Director of Judicial Education to discuss possible approaches. A program on gender fairness in the courts was presented at the November, 1998, Judicial Conference by Judge Marilyn Loftus, who is on the faculty of the National Judicial College. A program on gender fairness in the courts is also planned as part of the education program for the June, 1999, SBAND Annual Meeting.
5. The bench and bar should explore and develop mechanisms that will facilitate dialogue on gender fairness issues in the practice of law.
Referred to the Jackson Hole Group, which has agreed to compile a list of resources available from the National Center for State Courts, the Inns of Courts, and other states. These resources would be used to assist in presenting education programs to the bench and bar. The Committee has contacted the Inns of Court regarding development of a program on gender fairness in the courts.
6. A guide on how to conduct gender fair proceedings should be drafted and distributed to all judges. It could discuss forms of address, terms of endearment, and other topics as well as provide guidance about judicial intervention and welcoming behaviors for both formal and informal exchanges with the court.
7. The North Dakota Pattern Jury Instruction Committee [sic] should consider strengthening jury instructions which require jurors to act in a bias-free manner. Instructions which might be considered include the opening or preliminary instructions, the closing or "province of the court and jury" instructions, the witness credibility instruction, and the "duty to deliberate" instruction.
Completed. However, the Pattern Jury Instruction Commission is continuing its review of all instructions.
8. As part of existing jury orientation procedures and materials, jurors should receive an explanation of the meaning and effect of gender bias in judicial proceedings and of the right of every litigant to bias-free consideration of his or her claims and defenses.
Referred to the Jury Standards Committee of the ND Judicial Conference.
9. Research should be done to assist the court in determining the nature and extent of any gender bias in the jury deliberations process.
A juror exit questionaire is being distributed at the request of the Jury Standards Committee, with the goal of assembling data over the next year to evaluate juror perceptions. One question addresses the perception of bias in any part of the court proceedings.
10. In addition to the formal disciplinary systems that exist for both judges and lawyers, there should be created a more informal system -- to be used at the option of the person offended -- by which those accused of gender bias infractions will first receive a notice and an opportunity to discuss the situation before any official disciplinary measures are considered.
The Implementation Committee has begun review of informal complaint mechanisms established in other jurisdictions to address bias related complaints.
B. JURY SERVICE
1. There should be research on the effect of bias on jury functions.
The Implementation Committee is monitoring the use of a jury exit questionnaire, which is being distributed and used at the request of the Jury Standards Committee.
2. Revision of pattern jury instructions should be continued for gender inclusive language and ability to be particularized for gender of the party affected.
Completed. However, the Pattern Jury Instruction Commission is continuing its ongoing review of instructions for improvements in these areas.
3. All pattern jury instructions should be reviewed to determine whether they are clear enough or strong enough in prohibiting gender bias.
Completed. See, Recommendations A.7 and B.2, Status
4. As part of existing jury orientation procedures and materials, jurors should be instructed about the meaning and effect of gender bias in judicial proceedings and of the right of every litigant to bias-free consideration of his or her claims and defenses.
Referred to the Jury Standards Committee.
C. DOMESTIC LAW
1. This report should be used to identify perceptions of gender bias and risks of gender bias by the bench and bar. There should be judicial and attorney education addressing those perceptions and risks.
The Implementation Committee is coordinating a one day program on domestic violence and custody determinations to be included in the May, 1999, Judicial Institute education program.
2. Adoption of standards for custody evaluators and guardians ad litem, including training to ensure sensitivity to risks of gender bias in custody investigations and recommendations, should be encouraged.
3. A written computation, attached to the judgment or as an exhibit, showing determination of child support amounts should be required. Written findings showing justification for any deviation from the child support guideline should be required.
The Implementation Committee is reviewing information regarding local practices and procedures governing the submission of child support computation information by parties.
4. There should be judicial education addressing the need for temporary attorney fee awards and other problems of court access.
The Implementation Committee has recommended that this issue be included in the Family Law Seminar sponsored by SBAND.
D. DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
1. The topic of domestic violence and protection orders -- including information about the abuse dynamic, the dangers of misplaced emphasis on victim actions, failure to respect victim concerns, and the prevention of domestic violence -- should be addressed in education programs for judges, prosecutors and other attorneys, court personnel, and law enforcement officers.
The Committee has met with the SBAND Executive Director and CLE Coordinator and the Director of Judicial Education to discuss possible approaches. A one day program on domestic violence and custody determinations, and procedures in domestic violence cases generally will be included in the May, 1999, Judicial Institute education program.
2. The judiciary should reemphasize to the bar and explain to pro se parties that mutual protection orders in cases without cross petitions will not be issued. The temporary protection order issued to the respondent should make clear that mutual orders cannot be issued unless a petition is filed by the respondent requesting a protection order.
After review, the Implementation Committee has concluded this Recommendation would be addressed more appropriately through education to ensure awareness of current statutory requirements concerning issuance of mutual orders. See also, Recommendation D.1, Status
3. The topic of domestic violence should become part of the curriculum in family law courses in the state law school.
4. Means for developing or obtaining appropriate informational material on domestic violence for the general public should be explored.
5. Information regarding available resources and assistance for victims of domestic violence should be made available at the local courthouse.
The Implementation Committee is completing a survey of information that is currently available in local courthouses.
6. Appropriate funds should be provided to enable service providers (law enforcement, social services, prosecutors, lawyers, and others) to educate their own personnel about the complex nature of domestic violence.
Implementation Committee review indicates training is provided on a continuing basis for law enforcement and through the Attorney General's office and the State's Attorneys Association. Completed.
E. CRIMINAL LAW
1. Statistics should be maintained concerning the handling of assault cases, including sexual assault cases (statistics to include charging decisions, prosecution rates, conviction rates, sentencing decisions, and probation and parole decisions) with annual collection and compilation of the data. There should be a public policy that law enforcement officers and prosecutors pursue sexual offenses committed by a spouse, intimate partner, or acquaintance with the same seriousness given to violent crimes committed by a stranger.
The Implementation Committee has reviewed current data gathering initiatives; Public policy expression referred to Attorney General, State's Attorneys' Association, and Council on Abused Women's Services. Completed.
2. Judicial education programs to increase sensitivity to gender bias in the various stages of the criminal process should be developed.
The Implementation Committee has met with the SBAND Executive Director and CLE Coordinator and the Director of Judicial Education to discuss possible approaches. An education program regarding sex crimes and associated issues, such as the consent defense, is being considered as a possible program for the June or November,1999, Judicial Conference.
3. Education programs should be provided for judges and lawyers concerning sexual assault, spousal assault and rape, acquaintance rape, rape trauma syndrome, gender stereotypes and rape myths that may be employed in the trials of sexual offenses, consent defenses, and the rape shield statute.
A one-day program on gender-related issues in the areas of domestic violence and custody decisions is presently planned as part of the 1999 Judicial Institute. See also, Recommendation E.2, Status.
F. JUDICIAL SYSTEM AS EMPLOYER
1. Sexual harassment training should be an ongoing periodic feature of judicial education.
A program on sexual harassment law and procedures was provided for judges ant the November, 1999, Judicial Conference. An orientation program is now provided for new judges and judicial system employees to ensure familiarity with relevant personnel policies.
2. The role of the presiding judge in the prevention of sexual harassment should be established. An alternative procedure should be provided for situations where it is inappropriate to make complaints to the presiding judge.
The Implementation Committee is reviewing current policies and procedures.
3. A gender issues contact person should be designated in each judicial district to enhance understanding of existing sexual harassment policies and to respond appropriately to inquiries or concerns expressed by employees.
The Implementation Committee has retained this recommendation for consideration as part of its discussion of the development of appropriate educational programs. The Committee is also reviewing informal processes adopted in other jurisdictions to handle bias related complaints.
4. The Supreme Court should establish goals for personnel administration of courts at both levels, including the following: offer opportunities for employees to enhance personal skills, ensure timely and thorough reviews of job descriptions and accompanying pay grades; encourage striving for gender balance in hiring and promotion decisions whenever possible, as long as candidates present equal qualifications.
Referred to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court forwarded to the District Court and Supreme Court Personnel Advisory Boards that part of the recommendation concerning striving for gender balance in hiring and promotion. The Boards were asked to consider inclusion of similar language in personnel policies. The issue will be revisited with the newly established single Personnel Advisory Board.
5. All qualified persons should be encouraged to seek judicial office.
Referred to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court has expressed support for the seeking of judicial office by all qualified persons. Completed.
6. Participation by women on commissions and committees should be encouraged.
Referred to the Chief Justice and SBAND President. The Supreme Court directed the Clerk of the Supreme Court to include this encouragement when the Court seeks nominations for Commission and Committee memberships. The Bar Association will continue to seek out and appoint qualified members to committees and will also encourage qualified women to apply for court-appointed positions. Completed.