State v. McHugh

20000354 State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Clyde Edward McHugh, Sr. Defendant and Appellant

Appeal from: District Court, South Central Judicial District, Morton County
Judge Thomas J. Schneider
Nature of Action: Sexual Offense
Counsel:
Appellee: Brian David Grosinger , Asst. State's Attorney
Appellant: Severin, Ringsak & Morrow
Term: 04/2001   Argument: 04/19/2001  02:45pm
ND cite: 2001 ND 76
NW cite: 629 N.W.2d 585

Listen to recording of oral argument
using RealPlayer Basic,© a free download.

Issues: Appellant's Statement of the Issues:
1. Was there sufficient evidence to convict the defendant of the crime of gross sexual imposition?
2. Did the trial court err in refusing to permit the defendant to make an offer of proof of the proposed testimony of renae haug or permit haug to testify regarding a prior inconsistent statement of the victim?

Appellee's Statement of the Issues:
I. Whether there was sufficient evidence for the jury to find the defendant guilty.
II Whether the court erred on the issue of offer of proof or calling of a specific witness.

Add Docket 20000354 RSS Add Docket 20000354 RSS

Docket entries:
112/19/2000 NOTICE OF APPEAL: 12/18/2000
212/19/2000 ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT (Jane Gillig-Hoekstra): 12/18/2000
312/21/2000 RETENTION OF RECORD ON APPEAL: 02/06/2001
401/09/2001 TRANSCRIPT DATED 10-27-00 & TRANSCRIPT DATED 12-11-00 (2 volumes)
501/10/2001 DISK - TRA (10-27-00 & 12-11-00)
601/18/2001 RECORD ON APPEAL
701/26/2001 Supplemental Clerk's Certificate dated 1-25-01 (Entry No. 57)
802/19/2001 APPELLANT BRIEF
902/19/2001 APPELLANT APPENDIX
1002/19/2001 DISK - ATB
1103/19/2001 MOTION FOR WAIVER OF APPELLANT ORAL ARGUMENT (faxed letter dated 3-19-01)
1203/21/2001 APPELLEE BRIEF
1303/21/2001 DISK - AEB
1403/21/2001 ACTION BY SUPREME COURT (waiver of OA on behalf of Appellant). Granted
1504/19/2001 APPEARANCES: submitted on brief for AT; Brian D. Grosinger, Peggy Reynolds (victim advocate)
1604/19/2001 ARGUED: submitted on brief for AT; Grosinger (Vol. X; page 126)
1704/19/2001 ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST
1805/01/2001 UNANIMOUS OPINION: Per Curiam
1905/01/2001 DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED BY SUMMARY DISP.
2005/02/2001 Order/Judgment Mailed to Parties
2105/23/2001 MANDATE
2205/25/2001 RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE
2307/17/2007 EXPUNGED - Nonpermanent record items destroyed

Generated from Supreme Court Docket on 11/21/2008