Eide v. Eide

20010236 Janice Eide, Plaintiff and Appellant
v.
Ingvald Eugene Eide III, Defendant and Appellee
Appeal from: District Court, South Central Judicial District, Burleigh County
Judge Bruce A. Romanick
Nature of Action: Divorce/Property Div./Alimony
Counsel:
Appellant: Richard B. Baer, P.C.
Appellee: Rauleigh D. Robinson
Term: 05/2002   Argument: 05/28/2002  04:00pm
ND cite: 2002 ND 94
NW cite: 647 N.W.2d 706

Issues: Appellant's Statement of the Issues:
1. Did the lower court fail to properly address the legal issues in failing to amend the property agreement in this case? In other words did the lower court abuse its discretion in denying plaintiff's motion?

Appellee's Statement of the Issues:
1. Did the lower court fail to properly address the legal issues in failing to amend the property agreement in this case? In other words, did the lower court abuse its discretion in denying plaintiff's motion?

Add Docket 20010236 RSS Add Docket 20010236 RSS
Docket entries:
109/27/2001 NOTICE OF APPEAL: 09/24/2001
209/27/2001 ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT: 09/24/2001
309/27/2001 RETENTION OF RECORD ON APPEAL: 11/13/2001
411/02/2001 RECORD ON APPEAL, Exhibits, and Deposition
511/02/2001 TRANSCRIPT DATED 8-20-01
611/02/2001 DISK - TRA (8-20-01)
711/20/2001 MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL OR ALTERNATIVELY REMAND TO THE DISTRICT COURT. RspDue: 12/03/2001
812/03/2001 Response to Motion to Dismiss Appeal
912/06/2001 ACTION BY CHIEF JUSTICE (to determine request for attorney's fees). Granted
1012/06/2001 ORDER OF TEMPORARY REMAND (for purpose of determining the pending request of attorney's fees)
1112/06/2001 Order/Judgment Mailed to Parties
1201/08/2002 MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLANT BRIEF (no Mot.)
1301/08/2002 ACTION BY CLERK (sua sponte). Granted: 02/19/2002
1401/11/2002 RECORD ON APPEAL w/exhibits and deposition transcript
1502/11/2002 APPELLANT BRIEF
1602/11/2002 APPELLANT APPENDIX
1702/11/2002 DISK - (ATB)
1803/08/2002 APPELLEE BRIEF
1903/18/2002 Corrected TOA & page 10 for AEB
2003/18/2002 DISK - AEB
2104/09/2002 REQUEST TO RESCHEDULE ORAL ARGUMENT (AT)
2204/09/2002 ACTION BY CHIEF JUSTICE (OA continued to May Term of Court). Granted
2304/11/2002 Original Request to Reschedule Oral Argument
2405/23/2002 Request for waiver of oral argument (faxed letter from Richard Baer's office dated 5-23-02)
2505/23/2002 ACTION BY SUPREME COURT. Granted
2605/28/2002 APPEARANCES: submitted on brief (Vol. Y; Page 1)
2705/28/2002 ARGUED: submitted on brief
2805/28/2002 Original request to waive oral argument
2906/04/2002 DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED BY SUMMARY DISP.
3006/04/2002 UNANIMOUS OPINION: Per Curiam
3106/04/2002 Costs on appeal taxed in favor of appellee
3206/06/2002 Order/Judgment Mailed to Parties
3307/01/2002 MANDATE
3407/05/2002 RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE
3509/26/2007 EXPUNGED - Nonpermanent record items destroyed

Generated from Supreme Court Docket on 11/20/2008