Nowling v. BNSF Railway | ||||||||||||||||
| 20010302 |
Walter Nowling, Carol Nowling,
Rose Misialek, and Julian Lizakowski, Personal Representative of the Stephie Lizakowski Estate, Plaintiffs and Appellees v. BNSF Railway, Defendant and Bill Slominski d/b/a Minto Grain, LLC, Defendant and Appellant | |||||||||||||||
| Appeal from: |
District Court,
Northeast Judicial District,
Walsh County
Judge Laurie A. Fontaine | |||||||||||||||
| Nature of Action: | Real Property | |||||||||||||||
| Counsel: |
| |||||||||||||||
| Term: | 04/2002  Argument: 04/29/2002 01:30pm | |||||||||||||||
| ND cite: | 2002 ND 104 | |||||||||||||||
| NW cite: |
646 N.W.2d 719
Listen to recording of oral argument using RealPlayer Basic,© a free download. | |||||||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Issues: |
Appellant's Statement of the Issues: I. Whether the Trial Court Properly Understood and Properly Applied the Doctrine of Acquiescence. II. Whether the Trial Court Failed to Recognize the Special Status of the Railroad Right of Way as a Public Highway. III. Whether the Trial Court Failed to Recognize the Twenty Year Requirement in Adverse Possession and Boundary by Acquiescence Cases. IV. Whether the Trial Court Properly Identified Property to Quiet Against Defendants. Appellee's Statement of the Issues: I. Whether the trial court property (sic) understood and properly applied the doctrine of acquiescence. IIWhether the Trial Court failed to recognize the special status of the railroad right of way as a public highway. III.Whether the trial court failed to recognize the twenty year requirement in adverse possession and boundary by acquiescence cases. IV.Whether the trial court properly identified property to quiet title against defendants. | |||||||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| 1 | 12/10/2001 | NOTICE OF APPEAL: 12/06/2001 | ||
| 2 | 12/10/2001 | ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT: 12/06/2001 | ||
| 3 | 01/07/2002 | RECORD ON APPEAL & Exhibits | ||
| 4 | 01/22/2002 | TRANSCRIPTS DATED 10-5-00, 1-24-01, & 1-25-01 (3 vols.) | ||
| 5 | 01/23/2002 | DISK - TRA (10/5/00,1/24/01 & 1/25/01--3 disks) | ||
| 6 | 02/11/2002 | APPELLANT BRIEF | ||
| 7 | 02/11/2002 | Addendum to Appellant Brief | ||
| 8 | 02/11/2002 | APPELLANT APPENDIX | ||
| 9 | 02/28/2002 | DISK - ATB (corrected) | ||
| 10 | 03/13/2002 | APPELLEE BRIEF | ||
| 11 | 03/14/2002 | Motion to file Amicus Curiae Brief on behalf of Melvin, Mark & Suzi Tibert (via fax) | ||
| 12 | 03/14/2002 | ACTION BY CHIEF JUSTICE (MOT/Amicus). Granted | ||
| 13 | 03/15/2002 | Original Motion to File Amicus Curiae Brief | ||
| 14 | 03/15/2002 | MOT. EXT/TIME REPLY BRIEF (sua sponte) | ||
| 15 | 03/15/2002 | ACTION BY CLERK (MRY/sua sponte). Granted: 04/11/2002 | ||
| 16 | 03/18/2002 | MOTION to Deny Amicus Curiae Brief | ||
| 17 | 03/18/2002 | ACTION BY CHIEF JUSTICE. Denied | ||
| 18 | 03/18/2002 | Corrected Motion to file Amicus Curiae Brief | ||
| 19 | 04/25/2002 | Corrected Table of Authorities and pages for Appellees' Brief | ||
| 20 | 03/25/2002 | DISK - AEB | ||
| 21 | 03/27/2002 | AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF | ||
| 22 | 03/28/2002 | DISK - ACB (e-mailed) | ||
| 23 | 04/05/2002 | MOTION & MEMORANDUM FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF (City of Minto) | ||
| 24 | 04/05/2002 | Opposition by Amicus Curiae Tibert to Motion of the City of Minto (via fax) | ||
| 25 | 04/05/2002 | ACTION BY CHIEF JUSTICE (MOT/amicus curiae/Minto). Granted | ||
| 26 | 04/05/2002 | AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF (City of Minto) | ||
| 27 | 04/05/2002 | Addendum to Amicus Curiae Brief (City of Minto) | ||
| 28 | 04/08/2002 | Original Opposition by Amicus Tibert to Motion of City of Minto (Same as faxed copy filed 4-5-02) | ||
| 29 | 04/08/2002 | REPLY BRIEF of Appellants | ||
| 30 | 04/09/2002 | DISK - ryb | ||
| 31 | 04/16/2002 | MOTION FOR Acceptance of Expanded Reply Brief | ||
| 32 | 04/16/2002 | ACTION BY CHIEF JUSTICE. Granted | ||
| 33 | 04/29/2002 | APPEARANCES: Steven C. Ekman; Robert C. Fleming, Neil W. Fleming | ||
| 34 | 04/29/2002 | ARGUED: Ekman; Robert C. Fleming (Vol. X; Page 217) | ||
| 35 | 04/29/2002 | ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST | ||
| 36 | 07/11/2002 | DISPOSITION: REVERSED AND REMANDED | ||
| 37 | 07/11/2002 | UNANIMOUS OPINION: VandeWalle, Gerald W. | ||
| 38 | 07/11/2002 | Costs on appeal taxed in favor of appellant | ||
| 39 | 07/15/2002 | Order/Judgment Mailed to Parties | ||
| 40 | 07/23/2002 | MOTION BY AMICUS CURIAE FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO FILE PETITION FOR REHEARING & BRIEF (FAX) | ||
| 41 | 07/23/2002 | ACTION BY CHIEF JUSTICE (Mot by Amicus for Enlarge of Time). Denied | ||
| 42 | 07/24/2002 | Original of Mot by Amicus Curiae | ||
| 43 | 07/24/2002 | Objection from Steven Ekman counsel for AT to Amicus Curiae request for extension of Time (Fax) | ||
| 44 | 07/24/2002 | Mot. Ext/Time Petition for Rehearing (via fax) | ||
| 45 | 07/24/2002 | Objection from Steven Ekman to ext. of time to file petition for rehearing | ||
| 46 | 07/24/2002 | ACTION BY CHIEF JUSTICE. Granted: 08/01/2002 | ||
| 47 | 07/25/2002 | Mot/Ext/Time/Pet/Rehearing & Brief/Support (same as faxed copy filed 7-24-02) | ||
| 48 | 07/26/2002 | Objection from Mr. Ekman to Amicus Mot/Ext/Time/PER (same as faxed copy filed 7-24-02) | ||
| 49 | 07/26/2002 | Objection from Mr. Ekman to ext/time/file PER (same as faxed copy filed 7-24-02) | ||
| 50 | 07/31/2002 | PETITION FOR REHEARING | ||
| 51 | 08/01/2002 | DISK - PER | ||
| 52 | 08/15/2002 | ACTION BY SUPREME COURT (PER). Denied | ||
| 53 | 08/23/2002 | MANDATE | ||
| 54 | 08/28/2002 | RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE | ||
| 55 | 10/10/2007 | EXPUNGED - Nonpermanent record items destroyed |