Boehm v. Boehm

20010318 Sheila Boehm, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
David Boehm, Defendant and Appellant

Appeal from: District Court, South Central Judicial District, Burleigh County
Judge Burt L. Riskedahl
Nature of Action: Child Cust & Support (Div.\other)
Counsel:
Appellant: Robert V. Bolinske Jr.
Appellee: Kelsch, Kelsch, Ruff & Kranda
Term: 06/2002   Argument: 06/11/2002  9:30am
ND cite: 2002 ND 144
NW cite: 651 N.W.2d 672

Listen to recording of oral argument in MP3 format

Issues: Appellant's Statement of the Issues:
1. Whether The Trial Court's Division Of The Marital Home Was Inequitable?
2. Whether The Trial Court's Division Of Plaintiff's Wal-Mart Stock And Wal-Mart Profit Sharing Program Was Inequitable?
3. Whether The Trial Court's Valuation Of The Planet Video Business Was Improper?
4. Whether The Trial Court's Imputation Of Income To The Defendant For Purposes Of Child Support Was Improper?
5. Whether The Trial Court Erred In Denying Defendant's Motion For A Continuance?

Appellee's Statement of the Issues:
I. Was the trial court's valuation and distribution of the property and debts of the parties clearly erroneous?
II. Was the trial court's computation of the child support obligation of the Defendant for the support of his two minor children clearly erroneous?
III. Was the trial court's denial of Defendant's request for continuance an abuse of discretion?

Add Docket 20010318 RSS Add Docket 20010318 RSS

Docket entries:
112/27/2001 NOTICE OF APPEAL: 12/24/2001
201/10/2002 ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT: 01/08/2002
301/10/2002 RETENTION OF RECORD ON APPEAL: 02/27/2002
402/01/2002 MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLANT BRIEF & Brief in Support
502/01/2002 ACTION BY Chief Deputy CLERK(due 30 days after TRA is filed). Granted: 03/24/2002
602/22/2002 TRANSCRIPTS DATED 9-5-01 & 9-6-01 (2 vols.)
702/25/2002 Corrected page 9 for Transcript dated 9/5/01 & corrected page 202 for Transcript dated 9/6/01
802/26/2002 RECORD ON APPEAL & Exhibits,w/exception of #69--Affidavit of Service which the clerk's indicates is
902/26/2002 not in the file)
1002/26/2002 DISK (TRA)(9-5-01 & 9-6-01)
1103/25/2002 APPELLANT BRIEF
1203/25/2002 APPELLANT APPENDIX
1303/25/2002 DISK - atb
1404/11/2002 MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLEE BRIEF, Notice of Motion & Brief in Support
1504/11/2002 ACTION BY Chief Deputy Clerk. Granted: 05/17/2002
1605/17/2002 APPELLEE BRIEF
1705/17/2002 APPELLEE APPENDIX
1805/17/2002 DISK - AEB
1905/21/2002 Original signature page for the AEB
2006/11/2002 APPEARANCES: Robert V. Bolinske, Jr.; Todd D. Kranda
2106/11/2002 ARGUED: Bolinske; Kranda (Vol. Y; Page 5)
2206/11/2002 ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST
2308/29/2002 DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED/PT, REVERSED/PT
2408/29/2002 SPLIT OPINION: Kapsner, Carol Ronning
2508/29/2002 DISSENT: Sandstrom, Dale V.: DISSENT
2608/29/2002 Costs on appeal taxed in favor of neither party.
2709/24/2002 MANDATE
2809/26/2002 RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE
2910/15/2007 EXPUNGED - Nonpermanent record items destroyed

Generated from Supreme Court Docket on 10/30/2014