Gonzalez v. Tounjian
v.
Jessica Tounjian, Defendant
and
Dolund Partnership, L.L.P., Defendant and Appellant
Judge Frank L. Racek
| Appellant: | #Smith Bakke Oppegard Porsborg Wolf | |
| Appellee: | Maring Williams Law Office |
Listen to recording of oral argument
using RealPlayer Basic,© a free download.
I.Did the trial court err by creating a premises liability standard that is contrary to North Dakota law?
II.Did the trial court err in admitting expert testimony from an unqualified witness whose opinions were without foundation?
III. Did the trial court err in admitting evidence of future medical expenses without the necessary foundation required by North Dakota law?
IV. Did the trial court commit a mistake of law in allowing pre-judgment interest to be applied to future damages and non-economic damages?
Appellee's Statement of the Issues:
The Trial Court Properly Instructed the Jury on Controlling North Dakota Law on Premises Liability
The Trial Court Properly Instructed the Jury on the Common Law Duty of Care
The Trial Court Correctly Instructed the Jury on a Landlord's Statutory Duty of Care
The Evidence Supported a Finding of Negligence Under the Statutory and Common Law
The Trial Court did not Arbitrarily Exclude Evidence of a Lack of Notice of Hidden Dangerous Conditions
The Trial Court Properly Rejected the Analysis Set Forth in Gradjelick v. Hance, 627 N.W.2d 708 (Minn. App. Ct. 2001)
The Trial Court Properly Instructed the Jury Regarding the "Knowledge of the Law"
The Proposed Instructions Submitted by Dolund Were Incorrect Statements of North Dakota Law
The Trial Court Properly Admitted the Testimony From Dr. David Griffin
The Trial Court Properly Admitted Evidence Regarding Liliam's Future Medical Expenses
The Trial Court Correctly Calculated the Prejudgment Interest in this Case
Add Docket 20020263 RSS