Knodel v. Knodel

20030143 Elmer Knodel, Plaintiff and Appellant
v.
Caryl Knodel, Defendant and Appellee

Appeal from: District Court, South Central Judicial District, Sheridan County
Judge Gail H. Hagerty
Nature of Action: Divorce/Property Div./Alimony
Counsel:
Appellant: Maury Cameron Thompson
Appellee: #Ellison Law Office, PC
Term: 10/2003   Argument: 10/22/2003  01:30pm
ND cite: 2003 ND 176
NW cite: 674 N.W.2d 21

Listen to recording of oral argument
using RealPlayer Basic,© a free download.

Issues: Appellant's Statement of the Issues:
I. Whether the court's division of the property and debt was clearly erroneous?
II. Whether the court's decision will destroy, or at a minimum, damage the ability of Elmer to earn a livelihood or will significantly diminish the value of the property?
III. Whether awarding heavily burdened property to Elmer is fair or equitable?

Add Docket 20030143 RSS Add Docket 20030143 RSS

Docket entries:
105/13/2003 NOTICE OF APPEAL: 05/12/2003
206/10/2003 ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT: 06/05/2003
306/10/2003 MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLANT BRIEF (no MAT)
406/10/2003 ACTION BY CLERK (sua sponte) (delete MAT and ACL codes when ATB is filed). Granted: 06/21/2003
506/10/2003 TRANSCRIPTS DATED 1-02-03 AND 1-07-03 (NOTE: Ct. Reporter has indicated originals are with ROA)
606/10/2003 DISKS (2) - TRA dated 1-02-03 and 1-07-03
706/17/2003 MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLANT BRIEF
806/17/2003 ACTION BY CLERK. Granted: 07/01/2003
907/01/2003 APPELLANT BRIEF
1007/01/2003 APPELLANT APPENDIX
1107/01/2003 DISK - ATB
1207/01/2003 ANNOUNCED DISQUALIFICATION: Sandstrom, Dale V.
1307/10/2003 RECORD ON APPEAL including transcripts dated January 2, 2003 and January 7, 2003
1407/23/2003 MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLEE BRIEF & Affidavit in Support (faxed copy)
1507/23/2003 ACTION BY CLERK. Granted: 08/14/2003
1608/14/2003 APPELLEE BRIEF
1708/14/2003 APPELLEE APPENDIX
1808/15/2003 DISK - (e-mailed) AEB
1909/24/2003 SITTING WITH THE COURT: Rothe-Seeger, Cynthia
2010/22/2003 APPEARANCES: Maury C. Thompson; Susan L. Ellison
2110/22/2003 ARGUED: Thompson; Ellison (Vol. Y; Page 159)
2210/22/2003 ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST
2311/18/2003 DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED BY SUMMARY DISP.
2411/18/2003 UNANIMOUS OPINION: Per Curiam
2511/18/2003 Costs on appeal taxed in favor of appellee
2611/18/2003 Order/Judgment Mailed to Parties
2712/10/2003 MANDATE

Generated from Supreme Court Docket on 11/20/2008