Oppegard-Gessler v. Gessler

20030205 Janell Marie Oppegard-Gessler, Plaintiff and Appellant
v.
Richard Matthew Gessler, Defendant and Appellee

Appeal from: District Court, Northeast Central Judicial District, Grand Forks County
Judge Bruce E. Bohlman
Nature of Action: Child Cust & Support (Div.\other)
Counsel:
Appellant: Pearson Christensen & Clapp, PLLP
Appellee: Olson, Juntunen & Sandberg, Ltd.
Term: 12/2003   Argument: 12/16/2003  2:45pm
ND cite: 2004 ND 141
NW cite: 681 N.W.2d 762

Listen to recording of oral argument
using RealPlayer Basic,© a free download.

Issues: Appellant's Statement of the Issues:
Was the District Court's decision to deny a custodial parent's motion to relocate the parties' children to the home of her fianc‚ located approximately 200 miles away from the non-custodial parent's residence in North Dakota clearly erroneous?

Appellee's Statement of the Issues:
1. Whether the District Court's decision to deny a de jure custodial parent's motion to change the residence of the parties' children from Grand Forks, North Dakota to Baxter, Minnesota was clearly erroneous?

Add Docket 20030205 RSS Add Docket 20030205 RSS

Docket entries:
107/11/2003 NOTICE OF APPEAL: 07/09/2003
207/11/2003 ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT: 07/09/2003
307/11/2003 RETENTION OF RECORD ON APPEAL: 08/28/2003
408/21/2003 TRANSCRIPTS DATED May 8, 2003 (includes May 9, 2003 - pg 130) and May 22, 2003 (2)
508/25/2003 DISK of tras dated 5-8-03 and 5-22-03
608/25/2003 RECORD ON APPEAL (2 vols.) & Exhibits (Not rec'd: 73,79,104,105 & 106--Shorthand notes)
709/30/2003 APPELLANT BRIEF
809/30/2003 E-FILED BRIEF (ATB)
909/30/2003 APPELLANT APPENDIX
1010/01/2003 Surcharge fee received.
1110/06/2003 Affidavit of Service of the Appellant's Brief dated 10-3-03
1210/24/2003 APPELLEE BRIEF
1310/27/2003 E-FILED BRIEF (AEB)
1410/27/2003 Proof of Service of AEB on opposing counsel dated 10-24-2003
1510/27/2003 Payment of $25 fee for filing electronic AEB (Receipt # 15248)
1611/07/2003 REPLY BRIEF
1711/07/2003 DISK (RYB)
1812/16/2003 APPEARANCES: Jay H. Fiedler and Patrick W. Fisher
1912/16/2003 ARGUED: Fiedler; Fisher (Vol. Y; Page 187)
2012/16/2003 ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST
2106/30/2004 DISPOSITION: REVERSED AND REMANDED
2206/30/2004 SPLIT OPINION: VandeWalle, Gerald W.
2306/30/2004 (DISSENT): Sandstrom, Dale V.: DISSENT
2406/30/2004 Costs on appeal taxed in favor of appellant
2507/01/2004 Judgment Mailed to Parties
2607/26/2004 MANDATE
2708/09/2004 RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE
2811/04/2010 EXPUNGED - Nonpermanent record items destroyed

Generated from Supreme Court Docket on 04/23/2014