Morton Co. S.S.B. v. Schumacher | |||||||
| 20030226 |
Morton County Social Service
Board as assignee for Karen Hall, Karen Hall, and S.H., minor child, by and through her guardian, Karen Hall, Plaintiffs ------------- Karen Hall, Plaintiff and Appellant v. Thane Schumacher, Defendant and Appellee | ||||||
| Appeal from: |
District Court,
South Central Judicial District,
Morton County
Judge Bruce A. Romanick | ||||||
| Nature of Action: | Child Cust & Support (Div.\other) | ||||||
| Counsel: |
| ||||||
| Term: | 01/2004  Argument: 01/15/2004 09:30am | ||||||
| ND cite: | 2004 ND 31 | ||||||
| NW cite: |
674 N.W.2d 505
Listen to recording of oral argument using RealPlayer Basic,© a free download. | ||||||
|
| |||||||
| Issues: |
Appellant's Statement of the Issues: 1. Did the trial court commit reversible error when it found that no domestic violence had occurred to trigger the presumption against an award of custody to Schumacher? 2. Did the trial court commit reversible error when it found that Schumacher had greater love, affection, and other emotional ties between Shawn and her parents? 3. Did the trial court commit reversible error when it found that factor (a) under section 14-09-06.2(1), N.D.Cent.Code favored Schumacher? 4. Did the trial court commit reversible error when it found that factor (f) under section 14-09-06.2(1), N.D.Cent.Code favored Schumacher? 5. Did the trial court commit reversible error when it found that factor (g) under section 14-09-06.2(1), N.D.Cent.Code favored Schumacher? 6. Did the trial court commit reversible error when it found that factor (k) under section 14-09-06.2(1), N.D.Cent.Code favored Schumacher? 7. Did the trial court commit reversible error when it found that factor (b) under section 14-09-06.2(1), N.D.Cent.Code favored Schumacher? 8. Did the trial court commit reversible error when it found that factor (c) under section 14-09-06.2(1), N.D.Cent.Code favored Schumacher? Appellee's Statement of the Issues: 1. When the record was replete with inconsistencies by Karen Hall, did the court commit clear error by not finding credible evidence of domestic violence triggering a presumption of custody? 2. Did the court commit clear error by determining that Thane was favored on eight of factors constituting the best interest of the child? | ||||||
|
| |||||||
| 1 | 08/07/2003 | NOTICE OF APPEAL: 08/06/2003 | ||
| 2 | 08/07/2003 | ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT: 08/06/2003 | ||
| 3 | 09/05/2003 | TRANSCRIPT DATED 5-22-03 (Vol. I) and 5-23-03 (Vol. II) | ||
| 4 | 09/05/2003 | DISK - Transcripts (TR1 dated 5-22-03 and TR2 dated 5-23-03) | ||
| 5 | 09/15/2003 | RECORD ON APPEAL with exhibits | ||
| 6 | 10/14/2003 | MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLANT BRIEF (in Letter Form - Faxed) | ||
| 7 | 10/14/2003 | E-FILED MOTION (MAT) | ||
| 8 | 10/14/2003 | ACTION BY CLERK (MAT). Granted: 10/24/2003 | ||
| 9 | 10/21/2003 | APPELLANT BRIEF | ||
| 10 | 10/21/2003 | APPELLANT APPENDIX | ||
| 11 | 10/21/2003 | DISK - ATB (e-mailed) | ||
| 12 | 10/24/2003 | ANNOUNCED DISQUALIFICATION: Maring, Mary Muehlen | ||
| 13 | 11/17/2003 | Replacement pages for the Appellant's Appendix | ||
| 14 | 11/19/2003 | APPELLEE BRIEF | ||
| 15 | 11/19/2003 | APPELLEE APPENDIX | ||
| 16 | 11/21/2003 | Corrected Table of Authorities and pages for AEB | ||
| 17 | 11/21/2003 | DISK - AEB | ||
| 18 | 12/29/2003 | SITTING WITH THE COURT: Olson, Everett Nels | ||
| 19 | 01/15/2004 | APPEARANCES: Kent M. Morrow; Sherry Mills Moore, Thane Schumacher | ||
| 20 | 01/15/2004 | ARGUED: Morrow; Moore (Vol. Y; Page 194) | ||
| 21 | 01/15/2004 | ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST | ||
| 22 | 02/02/2004 | DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED | ||
| 23 | 02/02/2004 | SPLIT OPINION: Sandstrom, Dale V. | ||
| 24 | 02/02/2004 | (CONCUR IN RESULT): VandeWalle, Gerald W.: CON/RES | ||
| 25 | 02/02/2004 | Costs on appeal taxed in favor of Appellee | ||
| 26 | 02/02/2004 | Judgment Mailed to Parties | ||
| 27 | 02/12/2004 | Supplemental Clerk's Certificate dated 2-10-04 (Entry Nos. 84-86) | ||
| 28 | 02/17/2004 | Supplemental Clerk's Certificate dated 2-13-04 (Entry Nos. 87-88) | ||
| 29 | 02/24/2004 | MANDATE | ||
| 30 | 11/26/2004 | RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE | ||
| 31 | 11/08/2010 | EXPUNGED - Nonpermanent record items destroyed |