State v. Smith

20040114 State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Jesse Lynn Smith, Defendant and Appellant
Appeal from: District Court, Southeast Judicial District, Wells County
Judge James M. Bekken
Nature of Action: Drugs/Contraband
Counsel:
Appellant: Brian W. Nelson & Associates
Appellee: Kathleen Kay Murray , State's Attorney
Appellant: Thomas John Glass
Term: 10/2004   Argument: 10/19/2004  02:45pm
ND cite: 2005 ND 21
NW cite: 691 N.W.2d 203

Listen to recording of oral argument
using RealPlayer Basic,© a free download.
Issues: Appellant's Statement of the Issues:
I. The defendant has the right to appeal to the Supreme Court.
II. Whether the police officer had reasonable and articulable suspicion to stop the defendant.
III. Whether the search of the defendant's vehicle was an illegal search.

Appellee's Statement of the Issues:
1. Whether the Defendant Has The Right To Appeal To the Supreme Court.
2. Whether The Lower Court Correctly Denied the Defendant-Appellant's Motion to Suppress Evidence.

Add Docket 20040114 RSS Add Docket 20040114 RSS
Docket entries:
104/27/2004 NOTICE OF APPEAL: 04/19/2004
204/27/2004 ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT: 04/19/2004
304/27/2004 This case is consolidated w/20040115; make all entries except dis/man in this case
405/25/2004 TRANSCRIPTS DATED February 5, 2003 and March 30 & 31, 2004
505/25/2004 DISK - TRA of Feb 5, 2003 & March 30-31, 2004
605/28/2004 RECORD ON APPEAL (separate exhibits & correspondence)(not received state's exhibits 2-5)
707/06/2004 APPELLANT BRIEF
807/06/2004 APPELLEE APPENDIX
907/14/2004 Corrected Table of Contents, and pages for ATB - inserted
1007/14/2004 DISK - ATB
1108/03/2004 APPELLEE BRIEF
1208/04/2004 DISK - AEB
1310/19/2004 APPEARANCES: Thomas J. Glass; Kathleen K. Trosen (also present was Jenny Knetter, legal assistant)
1410/19/2004 ARGUED: Glass; Trosen (Vol. Z; page 42)
1510/19/2004 ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST
1611/15/2004 Record & separates 8 & 56 for State v. Glass (Wells Co. No. 02-K-00089)
1701/19/2005 DISPOSITION: REVERSED AND REMANDED
1801/19/2005 UNANIMOUS OPINION: Sandstrom, Dale V.
1901/21/2005 Judgment Mailed to Parties
2002/02/2005 Mot. Ext/Time Petition for Rehearing
2102/02/2005 E-FILED MOTION (e-mailed MPR)
2202/03/2005 ACTION BY CLERK. Granted: 02/11/2005
2302/04/2005 Affadavit of Service of Motion for extension of time of Petition for Rehearing
2402/09/2005 PETITION FOR REHEARING
2502/09/2005 Appendix to Petition for Rehearing
2602/11/2005 DISK - per
2702/16/2005 Motion for Substitute Opinion Page 6 (Sua Sponte)
2802/16/2005 ACTION BY SUPREME COURT (Substitute Page). Granted
2902/16/2005 Substitute Opinion Page (Page 6, paragraphs 17 and 18)
3002/16/2005 ACTION BY SUPREME COURT (PER). Denied
3103/04/2005 MANDATE
3203/09/2005 RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE
3306/17/2011 EXPUNGED - Nonpermanent record items destroyed

Generated from Supreme Court Docket on 05/20/2013