Hanson v. Hanson

20040275 Shawn Hanson, n/k/a
Shawn Johnson, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
David Hanson, Defendant and Appellant

Appeal from: District Court, East Central Judicial District, Cass County
Judge Wade L. Webb
Nature of Action: Child Cust & Support (Div.\other)
Counsel:
Appellant: Mertz Law Office
Appellee: Gjesdahl Law, P.C.
Term: 03/2005   Argument: 03/28/2005  1:30pm
ND cite: 2005 ND 82
NW cite: 695 N.W.2d 205

Listen to recording of oral argument in MP3 format

Issues: Appellant's Statement of the Issues:
I. Whether the trial court's denial of Dr. Hanson's motion to change custody was clearly erroneous?
II. Whether the trial court's failure to appoint a guardian ad litem was clearly erroneous?
III. Whether the visitation schedule ordered by the trial court was clearly erroneous?
IV. Whether the trial court's order on the authority to make major decisions for the children was clearly erroneous?
V. Whether the trial court's child support order was clearly erroneous?
VI. Whether the trial court's failure to award attorneys fees to Dr. Hanson was clearly erroneous?

Add Docket 20040275 RSS Add Docket 20040275 RSS

Docket entries:
109/29/2004 NOTICE OF APPEAL: 09/28/2004
209/29/2004 ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT (Steven Randall): 09/28/2004
310/01/2004 Letter from Court Reporter Gail Wells to Mr. Mertz RE: acknowledged OTR & requested payment
410/22/2004 RETENTION OF RECORD ON APPEAL: 11/17/2004
511/17/2004 TRANSCRIPT DATED 10-8-03, 6-17-04 (V.1), & 6-18-04 (V.2)
611/17/2004 DISK of tra dated 6-17-04 & 6-18-04
711/18/2004 RECORD ON APPEAL (3 vols.) & separates (64, 70, 96, 126, 127, 135, 139, 152, 165, & 166. NOT RECD:
811/18/2004 Nos. 7, 44, 92, 125, & 161 (Steno Notes) and 58, 74, & 130 (Tapes)
911/19/2004 DISK - TRA (10-8-03)
1012/23/2004 APPELLANT BRIEF
1112/23/2004 APPELLANT APPENDIX
1212/23/2004 DISK - atb (e-mailed)
1301/18/2005 APPELLEE BRIEF
1401/18/2005 DISK - AEB (e-mailed)
1502/01/2005 REPLY BRIEF
1602/02/2005 DISK (e-mailed) - RYB
1703/28/2005 APPEARANCES: Monty G. Mertz; Michael L. Gjesdahl
1803/28/2005 ARGUED: Mertz; Gjesdahl (Vol. Z; Page 97)
1903/28/2005 ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST
2004/26/2005 DISPOSITION (remanded): AFFIRMED/PT, REVERSED/PT
2104/26/2005 UNANIMOUS OPINION: Sandstrom, Dale V.
2204/26/2005 At the direction of the Court, no costs are assessed
2304/27/2005 Judgment Mailed to Parties
2405/24/2005 MANDATE
2505/26/2005 RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE
2611/09/2011 EXPUNGED - Nonpermanent record items destroyed

Generated from Supreme Court Docket on 09/01/2014