Heart River Partners v. Goetzfried

20050003 Heart River Partners,
a partnership, and
Dave D. Mees and James W.
Allen, partners, Plaintiffs and Appellants
v.
Darrell S. Goetzfried
and Karen A. Goetzfried, Defendants and Appellees

Appeal from: District Court, South Central Judicial District, Morton County
Judge Sonna M. Anderson
Nature of Action: Real Property
Counsel:
Appellant: Kelsch, Kelsch, Ruff & Kranda
Appellee: Chapman and Chapman, P.C.
Term: 06/2005   Argument: 06/10/2005  9:30am
ND cite: 2005 ND 149
NW cite: 703 N.W.2d 330

Listen to recording of oral argument
using RealPlayer Basic,© a free download.

Issues: Appellant's Statement of the Issues:
1. Whether any genuine issues of material fact exist which would preclude the entry of Summary Judgment against Heart River?
2. Whether the trial court erred in ruling as a matter of law that Goetzfried did not commit fraud or mistake in failing to disclose the existence of $46,599.00 in uncertified special assessments on the Goetzfried property sold to Heart River?
3. Whether the trial court erred in ruling as a matter of law that Goetzfried had no affirmative duty to disclose the existence of $46,599.00 in uncertified special assessments on the property Goetzfried sold to Heart River?

Appellee's Statement of the Issues:
a. Have the Appellants presented sufficient evidence of either actual fraud, or constructive fraud, to avoid summary judgment?
b. Does the parol evidence rule prevent a challenge to the unambiguous wording of the Warranty Deed, where the challenge directly contradicts the wording of the Warranty Deed?
c. Is reformation of a Warranty Deed available, where there is no evidence of a clear intention and understanding between the parties that contradicts the clear terms of the Warranty Deed?
d. Can the buyer in a commercial real estate transaction bring an action for fraud or reformation, if the buyer has failed to investigate the status of potential future special assessments against the property?

Add Docket 20050003 RSS Add Docket 20050003 RSS

Docket entries:
101/04/2005 NOTICE OF APPEAL: 01/03/2005
201/04/2005 ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT: 01/03/2005
302/02/2005 RECORD ON APPEAL
402/22/2005 TRANSCRIPT DATED September 28, 2004
502/22/2005 DISK of tra dated 9-28-04
602/24/2005 Certificate of Service of Copies of the Transcript by personal delivery
704/04/2005 MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLANT BRIEF, Notice & Cert. Service
804/04/2005 E-FILED MOTION (by facsimile)
904/04/2005 ACTION BY Chief Deputy Clerk. Granted: 04/20/2005
1004/21/2005 MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLANT BRIEF (sua sponte)
1104/21/2005 ACTION BY Chief Deputy CLERK (sua sponte). Granted: 04/21/2005
1204/21/2005 APPELLANT BRIEF
1304/21/2005 APPELLANT APPENDIX
1404/21/2005 DISK - atb
1505/20/2005 APPELLEE BRIEF
1605/20/2005 APPELLEE APPENDIX
1705/20/2005 DISK AEB
1806/10/2005 APPEARANCES: Thomas D. Kelsch; Charles L. "Casey" Chapman
1906/10/2005 ARGUED: Kelsch; Chapman (Vol. Z; Page 133)
2006/10/2005 ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST
2108/18/2005 DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED
2208/18/2005 UNANIMOUS OPINION: Sandstrom, Dale V.
2308/18/2005 Costs on appeal taxed in favor of the appellees
2408/19/2005 Judgment Mailed to Parties
2509/12/2005 MANDATE
2609/15/2005 RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE
2707/19/2012 EXPUNGED - Nonpermanent record items destroyed

Generated from Supreme Court Docket on 04/25/2014