Lagro v. Lagro

20050094 Leah M. Lagro, Plaintiff and Appellant
v.
James A. Lagro, Defendant and Appellee

Appeal from: District Court, South Central Judicial District, Burleigh County
Judge Donald L. Jorgensen
Nature of Action: Child Cust & Support (Div.\other)
Counsel:
Appellant: Loren Cay McCray
Appellee: Neubauer & Oster
Term: 06/2005   Argument: 06/20/2005  2:45pm
ND cite: 2005 ND 151
NW cite: 703 N.W.2d 322

Listen to recording of oral argument in MP3 format

Issues: Appellant's Statement of the Issues:
Was the trial court's denial of an evidentiary hearing on Leah Lagro's motion for custody modification clearly erroneous?

Appellee's Statement of the Issues:
Was the trial court's denial of an evidentiary hearing on Leah Lagro's motion for custody modification clearly erroneous?

Add Docket 20050094 RSS Add Docket 20050094 RSS

Docket entries:
103/17/2005 NOTICE OF APPEAL: 03/16/2005
204/25/2005 APPELLANT BRIEF
304/25/2005 E-FILED BRIEF (ATB)
404/25/2005 APPELLANT APPENDIX
504/25/2005 E-FILED APPENDIX (ATA)
604/29/2005 Received ATB from Central Duplicating
705/20/2005 RECORD ON APPEAL - not sent with the Record were Nos. 52 & 59 (Ct. Reporters Notes)
805/20/2005 No. 63 (Def. Ex. 50-54, 56, 61, 63, 65, 68 & 71)
905/24/2005 MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLEE BRIEF; AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT
1005/24/2005 E-FILED MOTION (MAE)
1105/24/2005 ACTION BY CLERK (MAE; w/understanding OA heard 6-20-05). Granted: 05/31/2005
1205/31/2005 APPELLEE BRIEF
1305/31/2005 APPELLEE APPENDIX
1405/31/2005 DISK - AEB
1506/20/2005 APPEARANCES: Loren C. McCray and Leah M. Lagro; Brenda A. Neubauer and James A. Lagro
1606/20/2005 ARGUED: McCray; Neubauer (Vol. Z; Page 136)
1706/20/2005 ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST
1808/18/2005 DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED
1908/18/2005 SPLIT OPINION: Sandstrom, Dale V.
2008/18/2005 (CONCUR IN THE RESULT): VandeWalle, Gerald W.: CON/RES
2108/18/2005 (DISSENT): Kapsner, Carol Ronning: DISSENT
2208/18/2005 COSTS ON APPEAL TAXED IN FAVOR OF APPELLEE
2308/19/2005 Judgment Mailed to Parties
2409/13/2005 MANDATE
2509/15/2005 RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE
2609/19/2012 EXPUNGED - Nonpermanent record items destroyed

Generated from Supreme Court Docket on 10/30/2014