Clark v. Clark

20050101 Lucas Clark, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Stacy Clark, Defendant and Appellant

Appeal from: District Court, Northwest Judicial District, Ward County
Judge William W. McLees
Nature of Action: Child Cust & Support (Div.\other)
Counsel:
Appellant: Probst Law Firm
Appellee: McGee, Hankla, Backes & Dobrovolny
Term: 10/2005   Argument: 10/05/2005  Waived
ND cite: 2005 ND 176
NW cite: 704 N.W.2d 847


Issues: Appellant's Statement of the Issues:
1. Did the trial court err in not making findings of fact with regards to custody?
2. Was the trial Court's denial of spousal support and attorneys fees clearly erroneous?
3. Did the Court err by ordering that Plaintiff's parents would take temporary custody of the parties minor child if Plaintiff was not able to provide the day-to-day care of the child?

Appellee's Statement of the Issues:
1.Does the Trial Court's memorandum provide valid reasons which are fairly discernible in its award of custody?
2. Was the Trial Court's denial of spousal support and attorney's fees clearly erroneous?
3. Was the Trial Court's award of visitation to the Paternal Grandparents (Plaintiff's parents) in the best interests of the child?

Add Docket 20050101 RSS Add Docket 20050101 RSS

Docket entries:
103/22/2005 NOTICE OF APPEAL: 03/21/2005
203/22/2005 ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT: 03/21/2005
305/09/2005 TRANSCRIPTS DATED 3/31/04; 8/20/04; & 11/17/04 (3 vols.)
405/10/2005 DISK - TRA (3 disks) (3/31/04; 8/20/04; & 11/27/04)
505/11/2005 RECORD ON APPEAL, Exhibits, & Transcript dated 3-31-04
606/09/2005 APPELLANT BRIEF
706/09/2005 APPELLANT APPENDIX
806/10/2005 DISK of ATB
907/11/2005 APPELLEE BRIEF
1007/11/2005 APPELLEE APPENDIX
1107/12/2005 DISK - aeb
1210/05/2005 APPEARANCES: submitted on briefs due to severe weather conditions
1310/05/2005 ARGUED: submitted on briefs due to severe weather conditions
1410/18/2005 DISPOSITION: REVERSED AND REMANDED
1510/18/2005 UNANIMOUS OPINION: Crothers, Daniel John
1610/18/2005 Costs on appeal taxed in favor of appellant
1710/19/2005 Judgment Mailed to Parties
1810/19/2005 MOTION FOR substitute paragraph 4 of the opinion (affects pages 1-5) (sua sponte)
1910/19/2005 ACTION BY SUPREME COURT (substitute paragraph 4). Granted
2010/19/2005 Substitute Opinion Pages 1-5 (correction to paragraph 4 affects pages 1-5)
2111/29/2005 MANDATE
2212/13/2005 RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE
2309/19/2012 EXPUNGED - Nonpermanent record items destroyed

Generated from Supreme Court Docket on 07/25/2014