Fischer v. Berger

20050182 Melvin Fischer and
Antonia Fischer, Plaintiffs and Appellants
v.
Adam P. Berger, Clara Berger,
Ronald G. Berger, and all other
persons unknown claiming any estate
or interest in, or lien or encumbrance
upon, the property described in the
Complaint, Defendants
-----------
Ronald G. Berger, Defendant and Appellee

Appeal from: District Court, South Central Judicial District, Morton County
Judge Gail Hagerty
Nature of Action: Real Property
Counsel:
Appellant: #Bucklin, Klemin, McBride & Schweigert, P.C.
Appellee: Kelsch, Kelsch, Ruff & Kranda
Term: 11/2005   Argument: 11/15/2005  1:30pm
ND cite: 2006 ND 48
NW cite: 710 N.W.2d 886

Listen to recording of oral argument in MP3 format

Issues: Appellant's Statement of the Issues:
A. Did the District Court err in determining that the Fischers were not entitled to an easement by prescription across the Berger property?
B. Did the District Court err in determining that the Fischers were not entitled to damages?

Appellee's Statement of the Issues:
1. Whether factual ruling that Fischers use of the trial across Bergers Property was not adverse was clearly erroneous?
2. Whether an easement by prescription can be acquired by the doctrine of acquiescence?

Add Docket 20050182 RSS Add Docket 20050182 RSS

Docket entries:
105/26/2005 NOTICE OF APPEAL: 05/25/2005
205/26/2005 ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT: 05/25/2005
305/26/2005 ANNOUNCED DISQUALIFICATION: Sandstrom, Dale V.
405/31/2005 Acknowledgement of Order for Transcript
505/31/2005 RETENTION OF RECORD ON APPEAL: 07/14/2005
606/27/2005 TRANSCRIPT DATED 1-21-05
706/27/2005 DISK - TRA dated 1-21-05
806/29/2005 RECORD ON APPEAL and exhibits
908/05/2005 APPELLANT BRIEF
1008/05/2005 APPELLANT APPENDIX
1108/05/2005 DISK - atb
1209/06/2005 MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLEE BRIEF (faxed)
1309/06/2005 E-FILED MOTION (MAE)
1409/07/2005 ACTION BY CLERK. Granted: 09/08/2005
1509/07/2005 APPELLEE BRIEF
1609/07/2005 DISK - AEB
1709/30/2005 REPLY BRIEF of Appellants
1809/30/2005 DISK - RYB
1910/12/2005 SITTING WITH THE COURT: Anderson, Zane
2011/15/2005 APPEARANCES: Lawrence R. Klemin; Thomas D. Kelsch
2111/15/2005 ARGUED: Klemin; Kelsch
2211/15/2005 ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST
2302/28/2006 DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED
2402/28/2006 UNANIMOUS OPINION: Maring, Mary Muehlen
2502/28/2006 Costs on appeal taxed in favor of appellee
2602/28/2006 Judgment Mailed to Parties
2703/30/2006 MANDATE
2804/03/2006 RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE

Generated from Supreme Court Docket on 10/30/2014