State v. Genre

20050238 State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Ryan Genre, Defendant and Appellant

Appeal from: District Court, Northeast Judicial District, Benson County
Judge Lee A. Christofferson
Nature of Action: Drugs/Contraband
Counsel:
Appellant: Olson Law Office
Appellee: James Peter Wang , State's Attorney
Term: 02/2006   Argument: 02/06/2006  2:45pm
ND cite: 2006 ND 77
NW cite: 712 N.W.2d 624

Listen to recording of oral argument in MP3 format

Issues: Appellant's Statement of the Issues:
I. Whether Defendant's rights against self-incrimination were violated during a routine traffic stop? (Wells County)
Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966),
State v. Helmenstein, 2000 ND 233, 620 N.W.2d 581.
State v. Langseth, 492 N.W.2d 298 (N.D. 1992)
Berkemer v. McCarty, 468 U.S. 420 (1984)
II. Whether the searches of Defendant and his vehicle were illegal. (Wells County)
State v. Varnado, 582 N.W.2d 886 (Minn. 1998)
Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968)
State v. Mitzel, 2004 ND 157, 685 N.W.2d 120
State v. Fields, 2003 ND 81, 662 N.W.2d 242
United States v. Jones, 269 F.3d 919 (8th Cir. 2001)
III. Whether the searches of Defendant's vehicle and hotel room were illegal. (Benson County)
State v. Mitzel, 2004 ND 157, 685 N.W.2d 120
City of Fargo v. Ellison, 2001 ND 175, 635 N.W.2d 151
U.S. v. Payne, 119 F.3d 637 (8th Cir. 1997).
IV. Whether statements made by Defendant to law enforcement should have been suppressed because they were made as a continuing part of plea negotiations. (Wells and Benson County)
NDRCrimP 11 (d).
United States v. Mulherin, 710 F.2d 731 (11th Cir. 1983)
United States v. Munoz, 408 F.3d 222 (5th Cir. 2005)
Santobello v. New York, 404 U.S. 257, 92 S.Ct. 495 (1971)

Appellee's Statement of the Issues:
Wells Co.'s Statement of Issues
1.Whether The Questioning Of The Defendant After The Traffic Stop Was Legal?
2.Whether The Searches Of The Defendant And His Vehicle Were Legal?
3.Whether The Searches Of The Defendant's Vehicle And Motel Room Were Legal?
4.Whether The Lower Courts Correctly Denied The Suppression Of The Statements Made By The Defendant?
Benson Co.'s Statement of Issues
1. Was the Search of the Genre's motel room legal?

Add Docket 20050238 RSS Add Docket 20050238 RSS

Docket entries:
107/19/2005 NOTICE OF APPEAL: 07/15/2005
207/19/2005 ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT: 07/15/2005
307/26/2005 RETENTION OF RECORD ON APPEAL: 09/03/2005
409/07/2005 MOT. EXT/TIME TRANSCRIPT (Deb McLean)
509/16/2005 ACTION BY CLERK. Granted: 10/04/2005
609/28/2005 MOTION to Consolidate Cases for Appeal
709/28/2005 ACTION BY CLERK (mot/consol cases). Granted
809/28/2005 THIS CASE IS CONSOL. W/ 20050239,20050247,& 20050248. MAKE ALL ENTRIES EXCEPT "DIS" IN THIS CASE
910/04/2005 TRANSCRIPTS DATED NOVEMBER 4, 2004, JUNE 13, 2005, JULY 13, 2005
1010/06/2005 2nd Certificate of Service of transcripts (Supreme Court Nos. 20050238 & 20050239)
1110/12/2005 RECORD ON APPEAL & Exhibits (NOT REC'D: #31--State;s Exh.2 & #32--State's Exh.3-- 2 TAPES)
1210/24/2005 Corrected title page, index page & corrected certificate page 17 for 7-13-04 Transcript; corrected
1310/24/2005 title page & index page for11-4-04 Transcript; and corrected title page & Content for 6-13-05 Tran.
1410/24/2005 DISK - tra (7-13-04; 11-4-04; & 6-13-05)
1511/10/2005 APPELLANT BRIEF
1611/10/2005 APPELLANT APPENDIX
1711/10/2005 DISK - ATB (e-mailed)
1812/08/2005 MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLEE BRIEF FOR WELLS CO. CASES(Faxed)
1912/08/2005 E-FILED MOTION (MAE)
2012/08/2005 ACTION BY CLERK (FOR WELLS CO.CASES). Granted: 01/12/2006
2112/09/2005 MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLEE BRIEF (James P. Wang, Benson Co. State's Attorney)
2212/09/2005 E-FILED MOTION (Wang's MAE)
2312/09/2005 ACTION BY CLERK (Wang's AEB). Granted: 01/12/2006
2401/12/2006 APPELLEE BRIEF (Wells Co.)
2501/13/2006 DISK - AE1 (Wells Co.)
2601/12/2006 APPELLEE BRIEF (Benson Co.)
2701/25/2006 Corrected Table of Authorities for AEB (Benson Co.)
2801/25/2006 DISK - AE2 (Benson Co.)
2902/06/2006 APPEARANCES: Robin L.Olson; Kathleen K. Trosen; James P. Wang
3002/06/2006 ARGUED: Olson; Trosen; Wang
3102/06/2006 ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST
3204/19/2006 DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED
3304/19/2006 UNANIMOUS OPINION: Crothers, Daniel John
3404/20/2006 Judgment Mailed to Parties
3504/20/2006 Corrected Opinion Title Page
3605/11/2006 Second Corrected/Substitute Opinion Title Page
3705/11/2006 MANDATE
3805/15/2006 RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE

Generated from Supreme Court Docket on 09/23/2014