State v. Moran

20050244 State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
William J. Moran, Defendant and Appellant

Appeal from: District Court, South Central Judicial District, Burleigh County
Judge Burt L. Riskedahl
Nature of Action: Dui/Dus
Counsel:
Appellant: Michael Ray Hoffman
Appellee: Julie Ann Lawyer , Asst. State's Attorney
Term: 01/2006   Argument: 01/12/2006  2:45pm
ND cite: 2006 ND 62
NW cite: 711 N.W.2d 915

Listen to recording of oral argument in MP3 format

Issues: Appellant's Statement of the Issues:
Issue for Review No. 1: Did the district court err in denying defendant's motion to dismiss made by defendant on speedy trial grounds?
Issue for Review No. 2: Did the State's closing argument rise to the level of obvious error requiring reversal?

Appellee's Statement of the Issues:
I.Whether the trial court erred in denying the Defendant's motion to dismiss.
II.Whether the State is required to remind the jury of the burden of proof beyond a reasonable doubt when the trial court has instructed them of the appropriate burden of proof.

Add Docket 20050244 RSS Add Docket 20050244 RSS

Docket entries:
107/20/2005 NOTICE OF APPEAL: 07/13/2005
207/20/2005 ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT: 07/13/2005
307/20/2005 RETENTION OF RECORD ON APPEAL & acknowledgement of order for transcript: 09/01/2005
408/29/2005 RECORD ON APPEAL & Exhibits (Not rec'd: #33--Court Reporter Notes)
509/01/2005 TRANSCRIPTS DATED 6-15-05 & 7-1-05 (2 vols.)
609/01/2005 DISK - tra (6-15-05 & 7-1-05)
710/10/2005 APPELLANT BRIEF
810/10/2005 APPELLANT APPENDIX
910/11/2005 DISK of ATB (e-mailed)
1011/04/2005 MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLEE BRIEF (faxed)
1111/04/2005 E-FILED MOTION (MAE)
1211/04/2005 ACTION BY CLERK (MAE, w/understanding OA will be heard in Jan.). Granted: 12/09/2005
1312/09/2005 APPELLEE BRIEF
1412/12/2005 CORRECTED APPELLEE BRIEF
1512/12/2005 DISK - Corrected AEB (e-mailed)
1601/06/2006 Request for Radio/TV Coverage - AP (e-mail dated 1-06-06 from Dale Wetzel) (authorized)
1701/12/2006 APPEARANCES: Michael R. Hoffman; Julie A. Lawyer
1801/12/2006 ARGUED: Hoffman; Lawyer
1901/12/2006 ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST
2003/29/2006 DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED
2103/29/2006 UNANIMOUS OPINION: Sandstrom, Dale V.
2204/04/2006 Judgment Mailed to Parties
2304/12/2006 MOTION FOR STAY OF MANDATE
2404/18/2006 Affidavit in Support of Motion for Stay of Mandate
2504/20/2006 ACTION BY CHIEF JUSTICE (Mot/Stay/Mandate). Granted: 07/18/2006
2607/20/2006 MANDATE
2707/25/2006 RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE

Generated from Supreme Court Docket on 10/17/2014