State v. Feist

20050423 State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Roy Allen Feist, Defendant and Appellant
Appeal from: District Court, Northeast Central Judicial District, Grand Forks County
Judge Lawrence E. Jahnke
Nature of Action: Other (Crim.)
Counsel:
Appellant: Robin L. Olson
Appellee: Peter David Welte , State's Attorney
Term: 03/2006   Argument: 03/20/2006  04:00pm
ND cite: 2006 ND 52
NW cite: 711 N.W.2d 606

Issues: Appellant's Statement of the Issues:
I. Whether failure to be informed of sex registration requirement nullifies a Defendant's guilty plea?
II. Whether the Court's failure to follow the requirements of Rule 11 of the North Dakota Rules of Criminal Procedure would preclude vacation of a guilty plea?

Appellee's Statement of the Issues:
I. Whether the District Court erred in denying the Defendant's motion to withdraw his guilty plea to a charge of indecent exposure when he failed to establish a manifest injustice.

Add Docket 20050423 RSS Add Docket 20050423 RSS
Docket entries:
112/06/2005 NOTICE OF APPEAL (filed by Roy Allen Feist): 12/05/2005
212/07/2005 Amended Notice of Appeal (filed in trial court on 12-6-05 by Robin L. Olson)
312/07/2005 ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT (filed by Robin L. Olson): 12/06/2005
412/16/2005 RETENTION OF RECORD ON APPEAL: 01/25/2006
512/19/2005 TRANSCRIPT DATED July 23, 2003 (original is in the record)
612/20/2005 Certificate of Service of Copies of the transcript
712/20/2005 DISK - transcript dated July 23, 2003
812/22/2005 RECORD ON APPEAL w/ (4 & 13 confidential) and 23 (transcript
901/09/2006 APPELLANT BRIEF
1001/09/2006 APPELLANT APPENDIX
1101/09/2006 DISK - ATB (e-mailed)
1202/01/2006 Payment of $25 fee for filing electronic AEB (Receipt 16747)
1302/07/2006 APPELLEE BRIEF (pdf)
1402/07/2006 E-FILED BRIEF (AEB - pdf)
1502/07/2006 APPELLEE APPENDIX
1602/08/2006 Copies made of e-filed AEB
1702/10/2006 Affidavit of Service by mail on February 9, 2006, of AEB due to technical difficulties w/efiled AEB
1802/15/2006 Consent to Appearance Under the Senior Practice Rule (Kelsee Macintosh) (faxed)
1902/16/2006 S.CT. DETERMINED ORAL ARGUMENT NOT NECESSARY
2003/20/2006 APPEARANCES: Argument waived on NDRAppP 34(a)(2)
2103/20/2006 ARGUED: Argument waived on NDRAppP 34(a)(2)
2203/29/2006 DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED BY SUMMARY DISP.
2303/29/2006 UNANIMOUS OPINION: Per Curiam
2404/04/2006 Judgment Mailed to Parties
2504/27/2006 MANDATE
2605/03/2006 RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE

Generated from Supreme Court Docket on 11/21/2008