Gabel v. N.D. Department of Transportation

20060003 Jay Gabel, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
North Dakota Department
of Transportation, Defendant and Appellant

Appeal from: District Court, Southeast Judicial District, Stutsman County
Judge Mikal Simonson
Nature of Action: Transportation Dept.
Counsel:
Appellant: Zachary Evan Pelham , Att. General Office
Appellee: Dickson Law Office
Term: 04/2006   Argument: 04/17/2006  2:45pm
ND cite: 2006 ND 178
NW cite: 720 N.W.2d 433

Listen to recording of oral argument in MP3 format

Issues: Appellant's Statement of the Issues:
Whether there was a reasonable and articulable suspicion to stop Gabel's vehicle based on detailed information of a traffic violation relayed to law enforcement from a known informant.

Appellee's Statement of the Issues:
Whether Deputy Kapp needed probable cause or a reasonable and articulable suspicion to conduct a traffic stop on Gabel's vehicle for an alleged traffic violation?

Add Docket 20060003 RSS Add Docket 20060003 RSS

Docket entries:
101/05/2006 NOTICE OF APPEAL: 01/04/2006
201/20/2006 DISK - TRA of Admini Hearing 5-18-05 (TRA is part of ROA)
302/10/2006 RECORD ON APPEAL - includes tra dtd 5-18-05 of Administrative Hearing
402/13/2006 APPELLANT BRIEF
502/13/2006 DISK - ATB
602/13/2006 APPELLANT APPENDIX
703/15/2006 APPELLEE BRIEF
803/20/2006 Corrected TOA & pages 5 & 9 for AEB
903/20/2006 DISK - aeb (e-mailed)
1004/03/2006 Request to reschedule oral argument (letter dated 4-03-06 from Jodi L. Colling)
1104/03/2006 E-FILED MOTION
1204/03/2006 ACTION BY CLERK (request to reschedule OA)
1304/17/2006 APPEARANCES: Zachary E. Pelham, Asst. Attorney General; Jodi L. Colling
1404/17/2006 ARGUED: Pelham;Colling
1504/17/2006 ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST
1608/16/2006 DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED
1708/16/2006 SPLIT OPINION: Kapsner, Carol Ronning
1808/16/2006 (DISSENT): Sandstrom, Dale V.: DISSENT
1908/16/2006 Costs on appeal taxed in favor of appellee
2008/18/2006 Judgment Mailed to Parties
2109/12/2006 MANDATE
2209/14/2006 RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE
2307/07/2011 Corrected/Substitute Opinion Page 8

Generated from Supreme Court Docket on 11/21/2014