Harshberger v. Harshberger

20060039 Christopher Paul Harshberger, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Tannya Dawn Harshberger, n/k/a
Tannya Dawn Radke, individually,
and as the natural guardian of
A.D.M., a minor child, Defendant and Appellant

Appeal from: District Court, Southwest Judicial District, Stark County
Judge Ronald L. Hilden
Nature of Action: Child Cust & Support (Div.\other)
Counsel:
Appellant: Bonnie Paradis Humphrey
Appellee: Neff Eiken & Neff, PC
Term: 09/2006   Argument: 09/13/2006  10:00am
ND cite: 2006 ND 245
NW cite: 724 N.W.2d 148

Listen to recording of oral argument
using RealPlayer Basic,© a free download.

Issues: Appellant's Statement of the Issues:
I. Whether the state of North Dakota has subject matter jurisdiction and therefore, proper authority to change custody and establish visitation of the minor child of the parties?
II. Whether there is an adequate basis in law for change of custody of the minor child?

Appellee's Statement of the Issues:
Issue one: Whether district court had proper subject matter jurisdiction to enter judgment in this action?
Issue two: Whether the findings of the trial court changing custody to father are clearly erroneous?

Add Docket 20060039 RSS Add Docket 20060039 RSS

Docket entries:
102/07/2006 NOTICE OF APPEAL: 02/06/2006
202/07/2006 ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT: 02/06/2006
303/07/2006 RECORD ON APPEAL
403/20/2006 TRANSCRIPTS DATED November 29, 2004 and November 8, 2005
503/20/2006 DISK - Transcripts (e-mailed)
604/27/2006 MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLANT BRIEF (E-filed memo from Bonnie Humphrey)
704/27/2006 E-FILED MOTION (MAT)
804/27/2006 ACTION BY CLERK. Granted: 05/30/2006
905/29/2006 APPELLANT BRIEF (PDF)
1005/29/2006 E-FILED BRIEF - ATB
1105/29/2006 APPELLANT APPENDIX (e-filed)
1205/29/2006 E-FILED APPENDIX (ATA)
1306/05/2006 Surcharge of $37 received (Receipt 16887)
1406/08/2006 Seven copies of ATB & six copies of ATA received from Central Duplicating
1506/29/2006 APPELLEE BRIEF
1606/29/2006 Addendum attached to Appellee's Brief
1706/30/2006 DISK of aeb
1807/05/2006 Motion to waive oral argument of behalf of the Appellant.
1907/05/2006 E-FILED MOTION (Motion to waive oa on behalf of Appellant)
2008/09/2006 ACTION BY SUPREME COURT (Motion to waive oral argument on behalf of the Appellant. Denied
2109/13/2006 APPEARANCES: Bonnie P. Humphrey; Charles L. Neff
2209/13/2006 ARGUED: Humphrey; Neff
2309/13/2006 ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST
2411/28/2006 DISPOSITION (JUDGMENT VACATED): OR/JUD VACATED, REMANDED
2511/28/2006 UNANIMOUS OPINION: Sandstrom, Dale V.
2611/28/2006 Costs on appeal taxed in favor of appellant
2711/29/2006 Judgment Mailed to Parties
2812/27/2006 MANDATE
2912/29/2006 RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE

Generated from Supreme Court Docket on 04/24/2014