State v. Voigt

20060271 State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Shane Voigt, Defendant and Appellant

Appeal from: District Court, South Central Judicial District, Burleigh County
Judge Thomas J. Schneider
Nature of Action: Sexual Offense
Counsel:
Appellant: Thomas John Glass
Appellee: Lloyd Clayton Suhr , Asst. State's Attorney
Term: 03/2007   Argument: 03/26/2007  9:30am
ND cite: 2007 ND 100
NW cite: 734 N.W.2d 787

Listen to recording of oral argument
using RealPlayer Basic,© a free download.

Issues: Appellant's Statement of the Issues:
I. The defendant has the right to appeal to the Supreme Court.
II. Whether jeopardy had attached after the jury was empanelled and sworn thereby invoking the defendant's fifth amendment right against double jeopardy.

Appellee's Statement of the Issues:
I. Whether, under The Doctrine of Continuing Jeopardy, Voigt's constitutional right against double jeopardy was violated by a continuance of his jury trial after the jury had been impaneled and sworn?

Add Docket 20060271 RSS Add Docket 20060271 RSS

Docket entries:
110/12/2006 NOTICE OF APPEAL: 10/06/2006
210/12/2006 ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT: 10/06/2006
310/24/2006 Transcripts dated 3-29-06 & 9-12-06 (2 vols.)
410/25/2006 DISK - tra (3-29-06 & 9-12-06)
511/06/2006 TRANSCRIPT DATED January 12, 2006
611/06/2006 DISK - TRA of 1-12-06 (e-mailed)
712/15/2006 MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLANT BRIEF & Brief/Support (e-filed)
812/15/2006 E-FILED MOTION (MAT)
912/15/2006 ACTION BY CHIEF DEPUTY CLERK. Granted: 01/15/2007
1001/03/2007 RECORD ON APPEAL & Separate #61 (PSI Addendum) (Not Rec'd: 36, 46,50 & 58--Court Reporter Notes)
1101/15/2007 APPELLANT BRIEF
1201/15/2007 APPELLANT APPENDIX
1301/15/2007 DISK of ATB (e-mailed)
1402/12/2007 APPELLEE BRIEF
1502/12/2007 DISK - AEB (e-mailed)
1603/26/2007 APPEARANCES: Thomas J. Glass; Lloyd C. Suhr, Asst. State's Atty
1703/26/2007 ARGUED: Glass; Suhr
1803/26/2007 ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST
1906/26/2007 DISPOSITION: REVERSED AND REMANDED
2006/26/2007 UNANIMOUS OPINION: VandeWalle, Gerald W.
2106/28/2007 Judgment e-mailed to Parties
2207/18/2007 MANDATE
2307/23/2007 RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE

Generated from Supreme Court Docket on 04/18/2014