Interest of R.F.

20060362

In the Interest of R.F.
-------
William Pryatel, M.D., Petitioner and Appellee
v.
R.F., Respondent and Appellant

Appeal from:

District Court, Southeast Judicial District, Stutsman County
Judge Mikal Simonson

Nature of Action:

Counsel:

Appellant:		Thomas E. Merrick
Appellee:		Kenneth L. Dalsted , Spec. Asst. Atty. Gen.

Term:

12/2006 Argument: 12/19/2006 04:00pm

ND cite:

2006 ND 258

NW cite:

725 N.W.2d 588

Issues:

Appellant's Statement of the Issues:
Whether modification of an alternative treatment order can be based on the patient's vulnerability to being harmed by others?

Appellee's Statement of the Issues:
I. May an alternative treament order be modified to prevent harm to the patient from danger resulting from the patient's failure to comply with the alternative treatment order?
II. Did the appellent properly raise the issue of violation under the Americans with Disabilites act?

Add Docket 20060362 RSS

Docket entries:

1	12/12/2006	NOTICE OF APPEAL: 12/11/2006
2	12/11/2006	TRANSCRIPT DATED 10/09/2006
3	12/11/2006	APPELLANT BRIEF
4	12/11/2006	E-FILED BRIEF (ATB)
5	12/11/2006	APPELLANT APPENDIX
6	12/11/2006	E-FILED APPENDIX (ATA)
7	12/11/2006	made 7 copies of ATB and 6 copies of ATA
8	12/12/2006	RECORD ON APPEAL, including original transcript dated 3/8/05
9	12/12/2006	DISK - TRA dated 10/09/06
10	12/14/2006	Letter dated 12/13/06 requesting waiver of oral argument on behalf of Appellant and Appellee.
11	12/14/2006	Motion to waive oral argument on behalf of the Appellant and Appellee.. Granted
12	12/14/2006	APPELLEE BRIEF
13	12/14/2006	E-FILED BRIEF - AEB
14	12/14/2006	made 7 copies of AEB
15	12/19/2006	APPEARANCES: waived under N.D.R.App.P. 34(f) and submitted on the records and briefs filed
16	12/19/2006	ARGUED: waived under N.D.R.App.P. 34(f) and submitted on the records and briefs filed
17	12/20/2006	DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED BY SUMMARY DISP.
18	12/20/2006	UNANIMOUS OPINION: Per Curiam
19	12/21/2006	Judgment Mailed to Parties
20	01/11/2007	MANDATE
21	01/17/2007	RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE

Generated from Supreme Court Docket on 12/01/2008