State v. Alexander

20060363 State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Sir Phillip Charles Alexander, Defendant and Appellant

Appeal from: District Court, Southeast Judicial District, Richland County
Judge Richard W. Grosz
Nature of Action: Misc. Statutory Offense (Felony)
Counsel:
Appellant: William Kirschner
Appellee: Arthur Warren Stokes , State's Attorney
Term: 05/2007   Argument: 05/25/2007  04:00pm
ND cite: 2007 ND 71
NW cite: 734 N.W.2d 342


Issues: Appellant's Statement of the Issues:
Whether the defendant was denied a fair trial because of the use of illegally obtained evidence from an unreasonable search of his residence?

Appellee's Statement of the Issues:
Whether the defendant was denied a fair trial because of the use of evidence from a search of his residence?

Add Docket 20060363 RSS Add Docket 20060363 RSS

Docket entries:
112/12/2006 NOTICE OF APPEAL: 12/07/2006
212/14/2006 ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT: 12/13/2006
301/05/2007 RECORD ON APPEAL
401/26/2007 TRANSCRIPTS (VOLS. I & II) DATED NOVEMBER 30,2006
501/26/2007 DISK -TRAS(11/30/06) ELECTRONIC
603/12/2007 APPELLANT BRIEF
703/12/2007 E-FILED BRIEF - ATB
803/19/2007 Motion to Allow Late Filing of Appellant's Brief
903/19/2007 E-FILED MOTION (to allow late filing of ATB)
1003/19/2007 ACTION BY CLERK. Granted: 03/12/2007
1103/20/2007 Received $25 Surcharge for ATB (Receipt 17321)
1203/19/2007 APPELLANT APPENDIX
1303/22/2007 Rec'd 7 copies of ATB from CSD
1403/29/2007 Clerk's Supp. Cert. of Record dated March 28, 2007, with entries 28 & 29 attached
1504/03/2007 APPELLEE BRIEF
1604/03/2007 APPELLEE APPENDIX
1704/03/2007 DISK - aeb (e-filed)
1804/09/2007 Request to waive oral argument on behalf of the appellee (e-mail)
1904/09/2007 E-FILED MOTION (Request to waive oral argument on behalf of the appellee)
2004/12/2007 ACTION BY SUPREME COURT (Request to waive OA on behalf of Appellee). Granted
2104/12/2007 Sua Sponte waiver of Appellant's OA under Rule 34(a)(2))
2204/12/2007 ACTION BY SUPREME COURT (Sua Sponte waiver of Appellant's oral argument under Rule 34(a)(2). Granted
2305/25/2007 APPEARANCES: waived under N.D.R.App.P. 34(a)(2) for the Appellant; waived under N.D.R.App.P. 34(f)
2405/25/2007 for Appellee
2505/25/2007 ARGUED: waived under NDRAppP 34(a)(2) for Appellant; waived under NDRAppP 34(f) for Appellee
2606/07/2007 DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED BY SUMMARY DISP.
2706/07/2007 UNANIMOUS OPINION: Per Curiam
2806/08/2007 Order/Judgment Mailed to Parties
2906/29/2007 MANDATE
3007/03/2007 RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE

Generated from Supreme Court Docket on 12/01/2008