State v. Tassler

20070078 State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Lawrence D. Tassler, Defendant and Appellant

Appeal from: District Court, East Central Judicial District, Cass County
Judge Douglas R. Herman
Nature of Action: Misc. Statutory Offense (Felony)
Counsel:
Appellant: Dennis D. Fisher
Appellee: Leah Jo Viste , Asst. State's Attorney
Term: 09/2007   Argument: 09/06/2007  04:00pm
ND cite: 2007 ND 153
NW cite: 742 N.W.2d 839


Issues: Appellant's Statement of the Issues:
I. The Trial Court Abused Its Discretion When It Revoked The Defendant/Appellant's Probation And Sentenced Him To Serve Six Months.

Appellee's Statement of the Issues:
Whether the trial court abused its discretion when it revoked the Defendant's probation and sentenced him to six months straight time.

Add Docket 20070078 RSS Add Docket 20070078 RSS

Docket entries:
103/22/2007 NOTICE OF APPEAL: 03/20/2007
203/30/2007 ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT: 03/28/2007
304/10/2007 TRANSCRIPT DATED February 26, 2007
404/10/2007 DISK - TRA (e-mailed)
504/13/2007 RECORD ON APPEAL w/Separates (Entry Nos. 12, 26, 34, & 35).
604/13/2007 Not rec'd w/ROA were Entry Nos.9,13,14,16,23,24,30,38, 46, & 47
705/21/2007 APPELLANT BRIEF
805/21/2007 E-FILED BRIEF
905/21/2007 APPELLANT APPENDIX
1005/21/2007 E-FILED APPENDIX
1105/23/2007 Received efiling surcharge of $25; receipt no. 17393
1205/25/2007 Rec'd 7 copies of ATB from Central Duplicating
1305/25/2007 Rec'd 6 copies of ATA from Central Duplicating
1406/14/2007 APPELLEE BRIEF (e-filed)
1506/14/2007 E-FILED BRIEF (e-filed)
1606/20/2007 Received $25 surcharge (Receipt #17590)
1706/26/2007 Received 7 copies of AEB from CSD
1807/23/2007 Request for waiver of oral argument on behalf of the Appellant
1908/06/2007 ACTION BY CHIEF JUSTICE (Request to waive oral argument on behalf of the Appellant). Granted
2008/06/2007 Sua sponte waiver of Appellee's oral argument under Rule 34 (a)(2)
2108/06/2007 ACTION BY CHIEF JUSTICE (Sua sponte waiver of Appellee's oral argument under Rule 34 (a)(2)). Granted
2209/06/2007 APPEARANCES: Appellant's argument waived under NDRAppP 34(f); Appellee's argument waived under
2309/06/2007 NDRAppP 34(a)(2)
2409/06/2007 ARGUED: AT's argument waived under NDRAppP 34(f); AE's argument waived under NDRAppP 34(a)(2)
2510/16/2007 DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED BY SUMMARY DISP.
2610/16/2007 UNANIMOUS OPINION: Per Curiam
2711/15/2007 MANDATE
2811/21/2007 RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE

Generated from Supreme Court Docket on 12/01/2008