Stanhope v. Phillips-Stanhope

20070137 Edwin L. Stanhope, Plaintiff and Appellant
v.
Heather J. Phillips-Stanhope, Defendant and Appellee

Appeal from: District Court, Northwest Judicial District, Ward County
Judge Gary H. Lee
Nature of Action: Child Cust & Support (Div.\other)
Counsel:
Appellant: Vogel Law Firm
Appellee: Probst Law Firm
Term: 11/2007   Argument: 11/07/2007  9:30am
ND cite: 2008 ND 61
NW cite: 747 N.W.2d 79

Listen to recording of oral argument in MP3 format

Issues: Appellant's Statement of the Issues:
I. Did the district court err when it failed to recognize the material changes in circumstance since the parties' divorce.
II. Should this court award Ed physical custody of the children based on the material changes in circumstances.

Appellee's Statement of the Issues:
I. Was the trial court's denial of Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Judgment clearly erroneous

Add Docket 20070137 RSS Add Docket 20070137 RSS

Docket entries:
105/16/2007 NOTICE OF APPEAL: 05/14/2007
205/16/2007 ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT: 05/14/2007
305/16/2007 ANNOUNCED DISQUALIFICATION: Kapsner, Carol Ronning
405/25/2007 TRANSCRIPT DATED November 15, 2006
505/29/2007 DISK - tra (11/15/06)
607/02/2007 MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLANT BRIEF (e-filed)
707/02/2007 E-FILED MOTION (MAT)
807/02/2007 ACTION BY CLERK (MAT). Granted: 07/16/2007
907/09/2007 RECORD ON APPEAL - Vols. 1 & 2 (separate entry nos. 32, 80, 107-108, & 111-131)
1007/13/2007 Referred by Clerk's Office--Appealability. RspDue: 07/23/2007
1107/17/2007 Response - letter dated July 16, 2007 on behalf of Appellant, Edwin Stanhope
1207/17/2007 ACTION BY CHIEF JUSTICE (MCL). Granted
1307/17/2007 ORDER OF REMAND
1407/23/2007 RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE
1508/23/2007 APPELLANT BRIEF
1608/23/2007 APPELLANT APPENDIX
1708/23/2007 RECORD ON APPEAL re-filed after Remand (2 vols. & separates 32, 80, 107, 108, 111-131(exhibits))
1809/20/2007 APPELLEE BRIEF
1909/21/2007 DISK - AEB
2010/25/2007 SITTING WITH THE COURT: Anderson, Sonna M.
2111/07/2007 APPEARANCES: Monte L. Rogney; Paul M. Probst
2211/07/2007 ARGUED: Rogneby; Probst
2311/07/2007 ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST
2403/24/2008 MOTION FOR REMAND WITH AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT
2503/27/2008 DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED
2603/27/2008 UNANIMOUS OPINION: Maring, Mary Muehlen
2703/27/2008 (Concur in the result): Sandstrom, Dale V.: CON/RES
2803/27/2008 Costs on appeal taxed in favor of Appellee
2903/27/2008 Judgment emailed to Parties
3003/27/2008 NO ACTION TAKEN (Motion for Remand)
3104/01/2008 Reply to Motion for Remand
3204/18/2008 MANDATE
3304/22/2008 RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE

Generated from Supreme Court Docket on 10/22/2014