Witzke v. Gonzales
|
| 20070162 |
John Witzke, Plaintiff and Appellant
v.
Ania Diaz Gonzales, Defendant and Appellee
|
| Appeal from: |
District Court,
South Central Judicial District,
Burleigh County
Judge Bruce A. Romanick |
|
Nature of Action: |
Torts (Negligence, Liab., Nuis.)
|
| Counsel: |
| Appellant: | |
Pro se
|
| Appellee: | |
Pro se
|
|
| Term: |
11/2007 Argument: 11/27/2007 04:00pm
|
| ND cite: |
2007 ND 191
|
| NW cite: |
742 N.W.2d 840
|
|
|
| Issues: |
Appellant's Statement of the Issues:
a) Did Judge Romanick err when he dismissed my lawsuit?
b) Why did Judge Romanick not respond to my motion for "production of evidence"? And then allow Gonzales to blatantly lie in court documents again without any consequences?
Appellee's Statement of the Issues:
1. Should the District Court have granted the defendant's motion to dismiss (summary judgment)?
|
|
 Add Docket 20070162 RSS
|
| 1 | | 06/11/2007 | |
NOTICE OF APPEAL: 06/08/2007 |
| 2 | | 06/11/2007 | |
ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT: 06/08/2007 |
| 3 | | 06/13/2007 | |
Acknowledgement of order for transcript |
| 4 | | 06/13/2007 | |
RETENTION OF RECORD ON APPEAL: 07/28/2007 |
| 5 | | 07/24/2007 | |
TRANSCRIPT DATED February 16, 2007 |
| 6 | | 07/24/2007 | |
DISK - TRA (2-16-07) (e-mailed) |
| 7 | | 07/25/2007 | |
RECORD ON APPEAL including separate entry 20 (exhibits); not included-entry 17 (steno notes) |
| 8 | | 08/31/2007 | |
APPELLANT BRIEF |
| 9 | | 08/31/2007 | |
APPELLANT APPENDIX |
| 10 | | 08/31/2007 | |
Proof of Service dated 8-31-07 of ATB on Ms. Gonzales |
| 11 | | 08/31/2007 | |
DISK - atb |
| 12 | | 09/06/2007 | |
APPELLEE BRIEF |
| 13 | | 09/06/2007 | |
DISK - aeb (CD-ROM) |
| 14 | | 09/19/2007 | |
REPLY BRIEF |
| 15 | | 09/19/2007 | |
DISK - RYB |
| 16 | | 10/26/2007 | |
S.CT. DETERMINED ORAL ARGUMENT NOT NECESSARY |
| 17 | | 11/27/2007 | |
APPEARANCES: Waived under N.D.R.App.P. 34(a)(2) |
| 18 | | 11/27/2007 | |
ARGUED: Waived and submitted |
| 19 | | 12/13/2007 | |
DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED BY SUMMARY DISP. |
| 20 | | 12/13/2007 | |
UNANIMOUS OPINION: Per Curiam |
| 21 | | 12/13/2007 | |
Costs on appeal taxed in favor of Appellee |
| 22 | | 12/14/2007 | |
Judgment Mailed to Parties |
| 23 | | 12/27/2007 | |
PETITION FOR REHEARING |
| 24 | | 12/27/2007 | |
DISK - PER |
| 25 | | 01/17/2008 | |
ACTION BY SUPREME COURT (PER). Denied |
| 26 | | 01/30/2008 | |
MANDATE |
| 27 | | 02/01/2008 | |
RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE |