Reopelle v. Workforce Safety and Insurance

20070240 Annie M. Reopelle, Claimant and Appellee
v.
Workforce Safety and Insurance, Appellant
and
The City of Fargo, Respondent

Appeal from: District Court, East Central Judicial District, Cass County
Judge Steven L. Marquart
Nature of Action: Workers Compensation
Counsel:
Appellant: Jacqueline Sue Anderson , Spec. Asst. Atty. Gen.
Appellee: Garaas Law Firm
Term: 12/2007   Argument: 12/06/2007  10:45am
ND cite: 2008 ND 98
NW cite: 748 N.W.2d 722

Listen to recording of oral argument
using RealPlayer Basic,© a free download.

Issues: Appellant's Statement of the Issues:
1. Does application of the five year limitation on partial disability benefits in N.D.C.C.  65-05-10(2), enacted in 1991 to Reopelle's claim abrogate a vested right?
2. Assuming the five year limitation on partial disability benefits applies to Reopelle's claim, is she entitled to further partial disability benefits?

Appellee's Statement of the Issues:
1. Does the language of N.D.C.C  65-05-10 (2) [post-1991 version] allow it to be applied to a claimant who has suffered a disabling work related injury and who was accepted for benefits prior to the date the pertinent language was first enacted?
2. Does Appellee Annie Reopelle have a vested right to partial disability payments under N.D.C.C.  65-05-10 [1989 version] that cannot be taken away by retroactive legislation?
3. Is N.D.C.C.  65-05-08 a distinct and separate statutory source for payment of disability benefits for work related injuries and does this statute require benefits to be paid for the entire period of the disability?
4. Is Annie Reopelle entitled to her attorney fees and costs in this appeal even if she does not prevail under N.D.C.C.  65-10-03 [1989 through 1993 version]?

Add Docket 20070240 RSS Add Docket 20070240 RSS

Docket entries:
108/22/2007 NOTICE OF APPEAL: 08/21/2007
209/21/2007 RECORD ON APPEAL & Record from Workforce Safety and Insurance
308/22/2007 ANNOUNCED DISQUALIFICATION: Crothers, Daniel John
409/28/2007 APPELLANT BRIEF (e-filed)
509/28/2007 E-FILED BRIEF (ATB)
609/28/2007 APPELLANT APPENDIX (e-filed)
709/28/2007 E-FILED APPENDIX (ATA)
809/28/2007 Affidavit of Service by Mail dated of ATB on counsel
910/01/2007 Affidavit of Service by Mail dated 10-1-07 of corrected TOC on counsel
1010/01/2007 Received $44.00 surcharge & additional fee for ATA (Receipt 17859)
1110/03/2007 Received $1.50 as additional surcharge for ATA (Receipt #17862)
1210/04/2007 Received 7 copies of ATB from Central Duplicating
1310/04/2007 Received 6 copies of ATA from Central Duplicating
1410/17/2007 APPELLEE BRIEF
1510/17/2007 Addendum to AEB
1610/18/2007 DISK (AEB)
1711/05/2007 REPLY BRIEF
1811/05/2007 E-FILED BRIEF (RYB)
1911/13/2007 Received 7 copies of RYB from Central Duplicating.
2011/23/2007 SITTING WITH THE COURT: Wefald, Robert O.
2112/06/2007 APPEARANCES: Jacqueline S. Anderson; David A. Garaas
2212/06/2007 ARGUED: Anderson; Garaas
2312/06/2007 ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST
2405/15/2008 DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED
2505/15/2008 UNANIMOUS OPINION: VandeWalle, Gerald W.
2605/15/2008 Costs on appeal taxed under N.D.C.C. 65-10-03
2705/16/2008 Judgment E-Mailed &Mailed to Parties
2806/06/2008 MANDATE
2906/10/2008 RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE

Generated from Supreme Court Docket on 12/01/2008