State v. Curtis | |||||||
| 20070250 |
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v. Edward Dana Curtis, Defendant and Appellant | ||||||
| Appeal from: |
District Court,
East Central Judicial District,
Cass County
Judge Burt L. Riskedahl | ||||||
| Nature of Action: | Misc. Statutory Offense (Felony) | ||||||
| Counsel: |
| ||||||
| Term: | 01/2008  Argument: 01/08/2008 10:45am | ||||||
| ND cite: | 2008 ND 108 | ||||||
| NW cite: |
750 N.W.2d 438
Listen to recording of oral argument using RealPlayer Basic,© a free download. | ||||||
|
| |||||||
| Issues: |
Appellant's Statement of the Issues: I.Was Mr. Curtis denied his constitutional right to a fair trial in violation of the fifth, sixth, and fourteenth amendments of the United States Constitution and of Section 13 of the North Dakota Constitution when he did not receive assistance in subpoenaing his witnesses? II.Did the trial court erred, as a matter of law, in allowing Mr. Curtis' criminal proceeding to continue when the matter should have been adjudicated civilly? III.Was the evidence sufficient as a matter of law to support the defendant's conviction of theft of property? IV.Was the conviction obtained against the weight of the evidence so as to require that the conviction be overturned? Appellee's Statement of the Issues: I. Whether the district court properly declined to give additional aid in issuing subpoenas for witnesses after the court had been informed by stand-by counsel that the requested witnesses could not provide relevant testimony to the issue of Theft? II. Whether the district court properly declined to apply the Civil Dispute Doctrine when there was neither a unique property law issue nor an issue traditionally settled in a civil forum? III. Whether the district court properly exercised its discretion in denying the Appellant's Rule 29 motion for acquittal when the court, after viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the prosecution, found that there was sufficient evidence for which a reasonable jury could find guilt beyond a reasonable doubt? IV. Whether the issue of "weight of the evidence" is waived or not properly preserved for appeal absent a timely Rule 33 motion for a new trial submitted at the district court level? | ||||||
|
| |||||||
| 1 | 08/27/2007 | NOTICE OF APPEAL: 08/23/2007 | ||
| 2 | 08/27/2007 | ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT: 08/23/2007 | ||
| 3 | 09/05/2007 | TRANSCRIPT DATED July 30, 2007 | ||
| 4 | 09/06/2007 | DISK - TRA 7-30-07 | ||
| 5 | 09/12/2007 | TRANSCRIPT DATED FEBRUARY 2, 2007 | ||
| 6 | 09/13/2007 | Dan Borgen has been appointed as counsel for Appellant Edward Curtis. | ||
| 7 | 09/20/2007 | RETENTION OF RECORD ON APPEAL (Vicky Matthys): 10/12/2007 | ||
| 8 | 09/28/2007 | Transcripts dated 4/7/06, 4/13/06, 5/4/06, 6/28/06, 7/26/06, 9/11/06, 9/20/06, 10/18/06, 10/20/06, | ||
| 9 | 09/28/2007 | 1/12/07, 4/4/07, & 6/7/07 | ||
| 10 | 09/28/2007 | DISK-tra(4/7/06,4/13/06, 5/4/06, 6/28/06, 7/26/06, 9/11/06, 9/20/06, 10/18/06, 10/20/06, | ||
| 11 | 09/28/2007 | 1/12/07, 4/4/07, & 6/7/07) | ||
| 12 | 10/01/2007 | Certificate of Service of copies of Transcripts filed 9/28/07. | ||
| 13 | 10/05/2007 | CORRECTED COVER PAGE FOR TRANSCRIPT DATED 2-2-07 | ||
| 14 | 10/05/2007 | DISK - Corrected TRA 2-2-07 (emailed) | ||
| 15 | 10/12/2007 | TRANSCRIPTS DATED August 14, 2007 and one cc of transcript dated August 16, 2007 (Proceedings) | ||
| 16 | 10/12/2007 | DISK - TRAs of 8-14-07 & 8-16-07 | ||
| 17 | 10/17/2007 | RECORD ON APPEAL w/Separates (Entry Nos. 79, 122, & 139) (also filed in 20070333) | ||
| 18 | 10/17/2007 | Not rec'd-CR Tapes (Entry Nos. 16, 20, 23, 28, 37, 40, 46, 64, 70, 82, 101, 118, 141-143, 157 & 163 | ||
| 19 | 11/05/2007 | Transcript of Revocation of Probation Hearing dated 9-13-07 (1 copy filed in 20070333) | ||
| 20 | 11/05/2007 | DISK - tra (9-13-07) (E-MAILED) | ||
| 21 | 11/06/2007 | Certificate of Service of Copies of 9/13/07 transcript | ||
| 22 | 11/15/2007 | Clerk's Supp. Certificate of Record on Appeal dated November 13, 2007, w/ entries 173-179 attached | ||
| 23 | 11/16/2007 | APPELLANT BRIEF (e-filed) | ||
| 24 | 11/16/2007 | E-FILED BRIEF (ATB) | ||
| 25 | 11/16/2007 | APPELLANT APPENDIX (e-filed) | ||
| 26 | 11/16/2007 | E-FILED APPENDIX (ATA) | ||
| 27 | 11/21/2007 | Received copies of Appellant's Brief from Central Duplicating Services | ||
| 28 | 11/21/2007 | Received copies of Appellant's Brief from Central Duplicating Services | ||
| 29 | 12/10/2007 | Efiling surcharge $60 for ATB & ATA through Interdepartmental Billing--No. 569578 | ||
| 30 | 12/17/2007 | APPELLEE BRIEF (e-filed) | ||
| 31 | 12/17/2007 | E-FILED BRIEF (AEB) | ||
| 32 | 12/19/2007 | Received $25 surcharge for AEB (Receipt No. 17959) | ||
| 33 | 12/21/2007 | REPLY BRIEF (e-filed) | ||
| 34 | 12/21/2007 | E-FILED BRIEF (RYB) | ||
| 35 | 12/27/2007 | Received 7 copies of AEB from Central Duplicating. | ||
| 36 | 12/27/2007 | Received corrected Table of Authorities and corrected pages for the Reply Brief | ||
| 37 | 12/28/2007 | Received 7 copies of RYB from Central Duplicating | ||
| 38 | 01/08/2008 | APPEARANCES: Daniel J. Borgen; Gary L. Delorme | ||
| 39 | 01/08/2008 | ARGUED: Borgen; Delorme | ||
| 40 | 01/08/2008 | ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST | ||
| 41 | 06/05/2008 | DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED | ||
| 42 | 06/05/2008 | UNANIMOUS OPINION: VandeWalle, Gerald W. | ||
| 43 | 06/06/2008 | Judgment E-Mailed to Parties | ||
| 44 | 06/27/2008 | MANDATE | ||
| 45 | 07/01/2008 | RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE |