Interest of J.S.L. | ||||||||||
| 20080227 |
In the Interest of J.S.L., a child
------------ Grand Forks County Social Services, Petitioner and Appellee v. T.L. (Mother), Executive Director, North Dakota Department of Human Services, Bismarck, North Dakota, Respondents and W.M. (Identified Father), Respondent and Appellant | |||||||||
| Appeal from: |
Juvenile Court,
Northeast Central Judicial District,
Grand Forks County
Judge Joel D. Medd | |||||||||
| Nature of Action: | Termination/Parental Rights | |||||||||
| Counsel: |
| |||||||||
| Term: | 02/2009  Argument: 02/05/2009 01:30pm | |||||||||
| ND cite: | 2009 ND 43 | |||||||||
| NW cite: |
763 N.W.2d 783
Listen to recording of oral argument using RealPlayer Basic,© a free download. | |||||||||
|
| ||||||||||
| Issues: |
Appellant's Statement of the Issues: I.Whether the trial court erred in finding there was clear and convincing evidence to support a finding of deprivation that was likely to continue. II.Whether the trial court erred in finding there was clear and convincing evidence that the child would likely suffer harm absent a termination of parental rights. III.Whether reasonable efforts were made to prevent removal of the child and to reunify the family once the child was removed. Appellee's Statement of the Issues: I.Whether there was clear and convincing evidence to support a finding that deprivation was likely to continue. II.Whether there was clear and convincing evidence that the child would likely suffer harm absent a termination of parental rights. III.Whether reasonable efforts were made to prevent removal of the child and to reunify the family once the child was removed. | |||||||||
|
| ||||||||||
| 1 | 09/11/2008 | NOTICE OF APPEAL: 09/08/2008 | ||
| 2 | 09/11/2008 | ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT: 09/08/2008 | ||
| 3 | 09/11/2008 | ----CONFIDENTIAL------- | ||
| 4 | 09/19/2008 | RETENTION OF RECORD ON APPEAL: 10/28/2008 | ||
| 5 | 10/23/2008 | TRANSCRIPT DATED August 13, 2008 | ||
| 6 | 10/24/2008 | Certificate of Service of Transcript | ||
| 7 | 10/24/2008 | DISK - tra (8-13-08) | ||
| 8 | 10/24/2008 | RECORD ON APPEAL (Not rec'd: 21, 27, 33, & 51 (Steno Notes) | ||
| 9 | 10/27/2008 | Corrected Certificate of Service of Transcript | ||
| 10 | 12/02/2008 | APPELLANT BRIEF | ||
| 11 | 12/02/2008 | APPELLANT APPENDIX | ||
| 12 | 12/02/2008 | DISK-ATB (E-MAILED) | ||
| 13 | 12/30/2008 | APPELLEE BRIEF (E-FILED) | ||
| 14 | 12/30/2008 | E-FILED BRIEF (aeb) | ||
| 15 | 01/02/2009 | Received $25 surcharge for AEB (Receipt #18664). | ||
| 16 | 01/06/2009 | Received 7 copies of AEB from Central Duplicating | ||
| 17 | 02/05/2009 | APPEARANCES: Douglas W. Nesheim and W.M., appellant; Marie Miller, 3rd-yr. law student appearing | ||
| 18 | 02/05/2009 | under the rules on the limited practice of law by law students and Jacqueline A. Gaddie, Asst. | ||
| 19 | 02/05/2009 | State's Attorney | ||
| 20 | 02/05/2009 | ARGUED: Nesheim; Miller | ||
| 21 | 02/05/2009 | ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST | ||
| 22 | 04/02/2009 | DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED | ||
| 23 | 04/02/2009 | UNANIMOUS OPINION: VandeWalle, Gerald W. | ||
| 24 | 04/06/2009 | Judgment E-mailed & Mailed to Parties | ||
| 25 | 04/23/2009 | Corrected Opinion Pages 6 and 15 | ||
| 26 | 04/29/2009 | MANDATE | ||
| 27 | 05/07/2009 | RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE |