Ude v. State

20080303 Brandon Lee Ude, Petitioner and Appellant
v.
State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee
Appeal from: District Court, South Central Judicial District, Burleigh County
Judge Robert O. Wefald
Nature of Action: Post-Conviction Relief
Counsel:
Appellant: Travis Wayne Finck
Appellee: Pamela Ann Nesvig , Asst. State's Attorney
Term: 03/2009   Argument: 03/10/2009  10:00am
ND cite: 2009 ND 71
NW cite: 764 N.W.2d 419

Listen to recording of oral argument
using RealPlayer Basic,© a free download.
Issues: Appellant's Statement of the Issues:
1. Whether the trial court erred in not taking oral argument at the post-conviction hearing held on November 14, 2008.

Appellee's Statement of the Issues:
Whether the trial court erred in denying Ude's Application for Post Conviction Relief on the grounds of ineffective assistance of counsel?

Add Docket 20080303 RSS Add Docket 20080303 RSS
Docket entries:
111/24/2008 NOTICE OF APPEAL: 11/20/2008
211/24/2008 ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT: 11/20/2008
311/24/2008 This case is consolidated w/20080304-20080306. Make all docket entries, except DIS & MAN codes,
411/24/2008 in this case.
512/04/2008 Acknowledgment of Order for Transcript by Court Reporter
612/05/2008 TRANSCRIPT DATED November 14, 2008
712/05/2008 DISK - transcript dated November 14, 2008
812/05/2008 Certificate of Service of Copies of Transcript
912/31/2008 RECORD ON APPEAL and separates including exhibit, transcript and PSI, not sent No. 29 Steno Notes
1001/13/2009 APPELLANT BRIEF
1101/13/2009 APPELLANT APPENDIX
1201/13/2009 DISK - ATB (CD-ROM)
1302/12/2009 APPELLEE BRIEF
1402/12/2009 DISK - AEB (e-mailed)
1502/20/2009 REPLY BRIEF (e-filed)
1602/20/2009 E-FILED BRIEF (RYB)
1702/24/2009 Received 7 copies of the RYB from Central Duplicating
1803/10/2009 APPEARANCES: Travis W. Fink and Todd A. Schwarz; Pamela A. Nesvig, Asst. State's Atty.
1903/10/2009 ARGUED: Fink; Nesvig
2003/10/2009 ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST
2104/30/2009 DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED
2204/30/2009 UNANIMOUS OPINION: Maring, Mary Muehlen
2305/04/2009 Corrected Opinion Pages - Title page and page 1
2405/06/2009 Judgment Mailed to Parties
2505/12/2009 PETITION FOR REHEARING (e-filed)
2605/12/2009 E-FILED BRIEF (PER)
2705/13/2009 Made 7 copies of Pet/Rehearing
2806/17/2009 ACTION BY SUPREME COURT (PER). Denied: 06/17/2009
2906/30/2009 MANDATE
3007/07/2009 RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE

Generated from Supreme Court Docket on 05/20/2013