Paulson v. Paulson

20090225 Mark Paulson, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Cheryl Paulson, Defendant and Appellant

Appeal from: District Court, South Central Judicial District, Burleigh County
Judge Bruce B. Haskell
Nature of Action: Divorce/Property Div./Alimony
Counsel:
Appellant: Justin Dale Hager
Term: 01/2010   Argument: 01/07/2010  Waived
ND cite: 2010 ND 100
NW cite: 783 N.W.2d 262


Issues: Appellant's Statement of the Issues:
A. Did the trial court err as a matter of law in not awarding the defendant any spousal support?
B. Did the trial court err in its valuation and distribution of the marital estate?

Add Docket 20090225 RSS Add Docket 20090225 RSS

Docket entries:
108/10/2009 NOTICE OF APPEAL: 08/07/2009
209/03/2009 ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT: 08/07/2009
309/03/2009 RECORD ON APPEAL & SEPARATE (ENTRY NO. 43).
409/21/2009 TRANSCRIPT DATED MAY 11, 2009, & C.O.S.
509/21/2009 DISK-TRA (5/11/09) E-MAILED
610/29/2009 APPELLANT BRIEF
710/29/2009 APPELLANT APPENDIX
810/29/2009 DISK - ATB
911/19/2009 e-mail dated 11-19-09 stating Mr. Ackre is no longer representing Mr. Paulson, and
1011/19/2009 Mr. Paulson does not plan on filing a brief.
1111/25/2009 Request to waive oral argument on behalf of Appellant
1212/21/2009 NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT
1312/22/2009 Request to waive oral argument on behalf of Appellant
1401/07/2010 APPEARANCES: Waived under N.D.R.App.P. 34(f)
1501/07/2010 ARGUED: Waived
1606/10/2010 DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED/PT, REVERSED/PT
1706/10/2010 SPLIT OPINION: Maring, Mary Muehlen
1806/10/2010 DISSENT: Sandstrom, Dale V.: DISSENT
1906/10/2010 At Court's direction, no costs will be taxed in this appeal
2006/10/2010 Judgment Sent to Parties
2107/08/2010 MANDATE
2207/15/2010 RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE

Generated from Supreme Court Docket on 10/31/2014