S.H.B. v. T.A.H.

20090267 S.H.B., Petitioner and Appellant
v.
T.A.H., Respondent and Appellee

Appeal from: Juvenile Court, Southeast Judicial District, Richland County
Judge Richard W. Grosz
Nature of Action: Termination/Parental Rights
Counsel:
Appellee: Don R. Krassin
Appellant: Erica Leigh Chisholm
Term: 02/2010   Argument: 02/18/2010  10:30am
ND cite: 2010 ND 149
NW cite: 786 N.W.2d 706

Listen to recording of oral argument in MP3 format

Issues: Appellant's Statement of the Issues:
Whether the petitioner has proven termination of parental rights is justified under N.D.C.C. 27-20-44?
a.Did the Respondent abandon J.E.B.-H. as a matter of law?
b.Is J.E.B.-H. a "Deprived Child"?
c.Is the deprivation likely to continue?
d.Will there be harm to the child?


Appellee's Statement of the Issues:
Was the trial court clearly erroneous in finding the mother had not sufficiently proven grounds for termination of the father's parental rights?

Add Docket 20090267 RSS Add Docket 20090267 RSS

Docket entries:
109/11/2009 NOTICE OF APPEAL: 09/10/2009
209/11/2009 ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT: 09/10/2009
310/14/2009 RECORD ON APPEAL
410/30/2009 TRANSCRIPT DATED JULY 29, 2009.
510/30/2009 DISK-tra (7/29/09)
611/02/2009 C.O.S. for transcript dated 7/29/09
712/09/2009 APPELLANT BRIEF (e-filed) PDF
812/09/2009 E-FILED BRIEF (ATB) PDF
912/09/2009 APPELLANT APPENDIX (e-filed) PDF
1012/09/2009 E-FILED APPENDIX (ATA) PDF
1112/10/2009 Received $25 e-filing surcharge for ATB (Receipt #19263).
1212/14/2009 Received copies of ATB from CSD
1312/14/2009 Received copies of ATA from CSD
1401/08/2010 APPELLEE BRIEF (E-FILED)
1501/08/2010 E-FILED BRIEF (AEB)
1601/11/2010 Received $25 e-filing surcharge for AEB (Receipt #19299).
1701/12/2010 Received 7 copies of AEB from CSD
1801/19/2010 NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT
1902/18/2010 APPEARANCES: Erica L. Chisholm/Don R. Krassin
2002/18/2010 ARGUED: Chisholm/Krassin
2102/18/2010 ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST
2208/17/2010 DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED
2308/17/2010 UNANIMOUS OPINION: Kapsner, Carol Ronning
2408/17/2010 Costs on appeal taxed in favor of Appellee
2508/19/2010 Judgment Sent to Parties
2609/17/2010 MANDATE
2709/21/2010 RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE

Generated from Supreme Court Docket on 09/30/2014