Laib v. Laib

20090284 Virgil Laib, Plaintiff and Appellant
v.
Lisa Laib, Defendant and Appellee

Appeal from: District Court, South Central Judicial District, Sheridan County
Judge Bruce B. Haskell
Nature of Action: Child Cust & Support (Div.\other)
Counsel:
Appellant: Pro se
Appellee: Gary R. Sorensen
Term: 02/2010   Argument: 02/11/2010  Waived
ND cite: 2010 ND 62
NW cite: 780 N.W.2d 660


Issues: Appellant's Statement of the Issues:
1. Did the District Court err in not awarding past due child support to the custodial parent?

Appellee's Statement of the Issues:
Whether the trial court erroneously denied Virgil Laib's June 23, 2009, Motion for an Award of Past Due Child Support.

Appellee's Statement of the Issues:
Reply Brief Issues:
Did the trial court err in not awarding past due child support to the custodial parent?
Add Docket 20090284 RSS Add Docket 20090284 RSS

Docket entries:
110/01/2009 NOTICE OF APPEAL: 09/30/2009
211/13/2009 Request for waiver of oral argument on behalf of Appellant in Conclusion of ATB
311/13/2009 APPELLANT BRIEF (e-filed)
411/13/2009 E-FILED BRIEF (atb)
511/13/2009 APPELLANT APPENDIX
611/13/2009 E-FILED APPENDIX (ATA)
711/16/2009 Received $25 surcharage for ATB (Receipt #19231)
811/17/2009 Received 7 copies of ATB from CSD
911/17/2009 Received 6 copies of ATA from CSD
1011/17/2009 RECORD ON APPEAL (3 vols.) NOT REC'D: #74 (Defendant's Exhibits) & 75 (Plaintiff's Exhibits)
1111/25/2009 MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLEE BRIEF
1211/25/2009 E-FILED MOTION - MAE
1311/25/2009 ACTION BY CLERK - MAE. Granted: 01/15/2010
1401/14/2010 APPELLEE BRIEF
1501/14/2010 APPELLEE APPENDIX
1601/04/2010 MOTION FOR attorney's fees (in AEB conclusion paragraph)
1701/15/2010 DISK (CD) - AEB
1801/19/2010 NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT
1901/25/2010 ACTION BY SUPREME COURT (oral argument waived on behalf of Appellant). Granted
2001/25/2010 Oral argument waived on behalf of Appellee (Sua Sponte) under Rule 34 (a)(2)
2101/25/2010 ACTION BY SUPREME COURT - Oral argument waived on behalf of Appellee under Rule 34 (a)(2). Granted
2201/26/2010 REPLY BRIEF
2301/26/2010 E-FILED BRIEF - RYB
2402/02/2010 Received copies of RYB from CSD
2502/11/2010 APPEARANCES: Waived under N.D.R.App.P. 34(f)
2602/11/2010 ARGUED: Waived
2704/06/2010 ACTION BY SUPREME COURT (Mot. for attorney's fees). Denied
2804/06/2010 DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED
2904/06/2010 SPLIT OPINION: Sandstrom, Dale V.
3004/06/2010 (CONCURRING and DISSENTING): Maring, Mary Muehlen: CON/DIS
3104/06/2010 Costs on appeal taxed in favor of appellee
3204/07/2010 Judgment Sent to Parties
3305/17/2010 MANDATE
3405/20/2010 RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE
3509/14/2010 Corrected/Substitute Opinion Page

Generated from Supreme Court Docket on 09/18/2014