State v. Fischer

20100039 State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
George G. Fischer, Defendant and Appellant

Appeal from: District Court, South Central Judicial District, Morton County
Judge Bruce A. Romanick
Nature of Action: Assault
Counsel:
Appellant: Mark Taylor Blumer
Appellee: Brian David Grosinger , Asst. State's Attorney
Term: 10/2010   Argument: 10/04/2010  04:00pm
ND cite: 2010 ND 193
NW cite: 795 N.W.2d 038


Issues: Appellant's Statement of the Issues:
1 Gordon George Fischer's convictions should be reversed because the evidence is insufficient to sustain the guilty verdicts.

Appellee's Statement of the Issues:
Whether the evidence at the jury trial was sufficient to sustain the convictions for Assault on a Peace Officer and Terrorizing.

Add Docket 20100039 RSS Add Docket 20100039 RSS

Docket entries:
102/02/2010 NOTICE OF APPEAL: 01/29/2010
203/01/2010 RECORD ON APPEAL & Separate Nos. 20 & 52
303/16/2010 S.Ct. Not. of Dismissal/Failure to Proceed
403/25/2010 NO ACTION TAKEN (MSN)
503/25/2010 MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLANT BRIEF (handwritten letter from George Fischer)
603/25/2010 ACTION BY CHIEF JUSTICE (Mot/Ext/ATB). Granted: 04/26/2010
704/05/2010 Notice of appointment of Mark Blumer as Appellant's attny
804/13/2010 Order for Transcript
904/13/2010 MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLANT BRIEF (E-filed)
1004/13/2010 E-FILED MOTION (MAT)
1104/14/2010 ACTION BY CHIEF JUSTICE (40 days after Transcript is filed). Granted
1205/26/2010 TRANSCRIPTS DATED November 3, 2009 and December 31, 2009 & C.O.S.
1305/26/2010 DISK- TRA DATED November 3, 2009 and December 31, 2009
1407/02/2010 MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLANT BRIEF
1507/02/2010 ACTION BY CHIEF JUSTICE. Granted: 07/26/2010
1607/26/2010 APPELLANT BRIEF (e-filed)
1707/26/2010 E-FILED BRIEF (ATB)
1807/26/2010 APPELLANT APPENDIX (e-filed)
1907/26/2010 E-FILED APPENDIX (ATA)
2007/27/2010 Received $25 surcharge for ATB (Receipt #19736)
2108/06/2010 Rec'd 7 copies of ATB from CSD
2208/06/2010 Received 6 copies of ATA from CSD
2308/25/2010 APPELLEE BRIEF
2408/25/2010 DISK - aeb (e-mailed)
2509/20/2010 NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT
2609/22/2010 Request to waive oral argument on behalf of Appellant
2709/22/2010 ACTION BY SUPREME COURT (request to waiver oral argument on behalf of Appellant). Granted
2809/22/2010 Request to waive oral argument on behalf of Appellee under Rule 34(a)(2) (Sua Sponte)
2909/22/2010 ACTION BY SUPREME COURT (Sua Sponte request to waive oral argument on behalf of Appellee). Granted
3010/04/2010 APPEARANCES: Waived under N.D.R.App.P. 34(f) and (a)(2)
3110/04/2010 ARGUED: Waived
3210/19/2010 DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED BY SUMMARY DISP.
3310/19/2010 UNANIMOUS OPINION: Per Curiam
3410/20/2010 Judgment Sent to Parties
3511/18/2010 MANDATE
3611/22/2010 RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE

Generated from Supreme Court Docket on 05/17/2013