Halvorson v. Starr

20100068 Clifford Halvorson and Leona
Halvorson, Plaintiffs and Appellants
v.
Paul Arthur Starr, Carl Axel Starr,
Signe Myrtle Johnson, Earnest Melvin
Starr a/k/a Ernest Melvin Starr,
Martha Viola Mauge a/k/a Martha Viola
Willson, Reuben John Starr, Kenneth LaBelle,
Priscilla LaBelle, Dennis LaBelle, Sandra
LaBelle, Donna Ross a/k/a Donna A. Ross,
Andrew Ross, Carolyn Starr, Darlene Walth,
Reuben James Starr, Signe Verhasselt,
Daryl Starr, Christina Bonacossa, Evelyn A.
Starr, Marilyn Starr, Paul Starr, Carol Curtis,
William Mauge, Kathryn Anderson, Harold Anderson,
Rosalinda Jordan, Rosalie Jordan; All unknown
heirs of Paul Arthur Starr, Carl Axel Starr,
Signe Myrtle Johnson, Earnest Melvin
Starr a/k/a Ernest Melvin Starr,
Martha Viola Mauge a/k/a Martha Viola
Willson, Reuben John Starr, Kenneth LaBelle,
Priscilla LaBelle, Dennis LaBelle, Sandra
LaBelle, Donna Ross a/k/a Donna A. Ross,
Andrew Ross, Carolyn Starr, Darlene Walth,
Reuben James Starr, Signe Verhasselt,
Daryl Starr, Christina Bonacossa, Evelyn A.
Starr, Marilyn Starr, Paul Starr, Carol Curtis,
William Mauge, Kathryn Anderson, Harold Anderson,
Rosalinda Jordan, Rosalie Jordan; The Dublin
Company and all other persons unknown claiming
any estate or interest in, or lien or encumbrance
upon the property described in the Complaint, Defendants and Appellees

Appeal from: District Court, Northwest Judicial District, Mountrail County
Judge Gary H. Lee
Nature of Action: Oil, Gas and Minerals
Counsel:
Appellant: Wade G. Enget
Appellee: Steven J. Wild
Term: 06/2010   Argument: 06/22/2010  9:30am
ND cite: 2010 ND 133
NW cite: 785 N.W.2d 248

Listen to recording of oral argument in MP3 format

Issues: Appellant's Statement of the Issues:
Whether the District Court erred in granting Summary Judgment in favor of Starrs by failing to apply the applicable statutory and case law.

Appellee's Statement of the Issues:
The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred when it decided NDCC 1-02-15 is the applicable statute for the purpose of calculating the 10 day mailing requirement of NDCC 38-18.1-06.

Add Docket 20100068 RSS Add Docket 20100068 RSS

Docket entries:
103/03/2010 NOTICE OF APPEAL: 03/01/2010
204/09/2010 MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLANT BRIEF
304/09/2010 ACTION BY CLERK (MAT). Granted: 04/26/2010
404/12/2010 RECORD ON APPEAL (1 volume)
504/26/2010 APPELLANT BRIEF & ADDENDUM
604/26/2010 APPELLANT APPENDIX
704/26/2010 DISK-ATB (E-MAILED)
804/28/2010 Received additional copy of pg. 15 for ATB.
905/19/2010 APPELLEE BRIEF
1005/19/2010 DISK-AEB
1105/20/2010 NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT
1206/22/2010 APPEARANCES: Wade G. Enget and Amber J. Fiesel; Steven J. Wild
1306/22/2010 ARGUED: Enget; Wild
1406/22/2010 ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST
1507/13/2010 DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED
1607/13/2010 UNANIMOUS OPINION: VandeWalle, Gerald W.
1707/13/2010 Costs on appeal taxed in favor of Appellees
1807/15/2010 Judgment E-Mailed & Faxed to Parties
1908/13/2010 MANDATE
2008/17/2010 RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE

Generated from Supreme Court Docket on 10/24/2014