State v. Carpenter
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
Joseph Anthony Carpenter, Defendant and Appellant
South Central Judicial District,
Judge Bruce A. Romanick
|Nature of Action:||Misc. Statutory Offense (Felony)|
|Term:||10/2010  Argument: 10/07/2010|
|ND cite:||2011 ND 20|
793 N.W.2d 765
Listen to recording of oral argument in MP3 format
Appellant's Statement of the Issues:|
Was there sufficient evidence to support the jury's verdict of guilty of the charge of Endangering by Fire or Explosion?
Did the trial court err in permitting the State to file Notice of Habitual Offender status at a late date in the proceedings?
Was the jury's verdict inconsistent and should not stand?
Appellee's Statement of the Issues:
Whether sufficient evidence existed to find the defendant guilty of endangerment by fire?
Whether the procedures used by the trial court to find the defendant is a habitual criminal offender complied with the law?
The trial court did not err in having the jury decide the defendant was a habitual offender.
The verdict form used by the trial court appropriately gave instructions to the jury as to what they must find.
|Add Docket 20100085 RSS|
|1||03/15/2010 NOTICE OF APPEAL: 03/12/2010|
|2||03/15/2010 ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT: 03/12/2010|
|3||03/15/2010 RETENTION OF RECORD ON APPEAL|
|4||05/04/2010 TRANSCRIPTS DATED Dec. 2, 2009 & Mar. 9, 2010, one copy of Transcript dated Nov. 4, 2009 & C.O.S.|
|5||05/04/2010 (NOTE: the original tran. dated 11-4-09 is part of the ROA)|
|6||05/04/2010 DISK - tra (11/4/09; 12/2/09; & 3-9-10) (e-mailed)|
|7||05/07/2010 RECORD ON APPEAL & Separate Nos. 18, 30, 31, 32, 34, 35, 36, 38, 40 & 41 (not rec'd: #29-Exh. #1-|
|8||05/07/2010 Gas Can); 33 (Exh. 17--Towel w/blood drops), 37 (Exh. 22--Defendant's Clothes),|
|9||05/07/2010 & 39 (Exh. 26--White Board w/ Blood Drops)|
|10||06/09/2010 MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLANT BRIEF|
|11||06/10/2010 ACTION BY CLERK. Granted: 07/07/2010|
|12||07/02/2010 APPELLANT BRIEF (e-filed)|
|13||07/02/2010 E-FILED BRIEF (ATB)|
|14||07/02/2010 APPELLANT APPENDIX (e-filed) PDF|
|15||07/02/2010 E-FILED APPENDIX (ATA) PDF|
|16||07/07/2010 Received $25 e-filing surcharge for ATB (Receipt #19705).|
|17||07/09/2010 Received 7 copies of ATB from Central Duplicating.|
|18||07/09/2010 Received 6 copies of ATA from Central Duplicating.|
|19||08/02/2010 APPELLEE BRIEF|
|20||08/06/2010 DISK of AEB (e-mailed)|
|21||09/21/2010 NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT|
|22||10/07/2010 ARGUED: Kent M. Morrow; Ladd R. Erickson|
|23||10/07/2010 APPEARANCES: Kent M. Morrow; Ladd R. Erickson|
|24||10/07/2010 ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST|
|25||02/08/2011 DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED/PT, REVERSED/PT|
|26||02/08/2011 UNANIMOUS OPINION: Kapsner, Carol Ronning|
|27||02/08/2011 concur in the result: Sandstrom, Dale V.: CON/RES|
|28||02/08/2011 concur in the result: Crothers, Daniel John: CON/RES|
|29||02/09/2011 Judgment Sent to Parties|
|31||03/04/2011 RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE|