Matter of G.R.H.
In the Matter of G.R.H.
Rozanna C. Larson,
Ward County State's Attorney Petitioner and Appellee
G.R.H., Respondent and Appellant
North Central Judicial District,
Judge Douglas L. Mattson
|Nature of Action:||Civil Commit of Sexual Predator|
|Term:||11/2010  Argument: 11/03/2010 Waived|
|ND cite:||2011 ND 21|
793 N.W.2d 460
Appellant's Statement of the Issues:|
I.The District Court should not have considered G.R.H.'s recent admissions based on self-incrimination considerations.
II.The District Court erred when it determined that there was clear and convincing evidence that G.R.H. is likely to engage in further acts of sexually predatory conduct.
III.The District Court erred in finding that G.R.H. remained a sexually dangerous individual, for the District Court failed to find that G.R.H. has a serious difficulty in controlling his behavior.
Appellee's Statement of the Issues:
I. The trial court correctly overruled G.R.H.'s objection to admissibility of admissions made during treatment.
II. The District Court correctly determined that there was clear and convincing evidence that G.R.H. is likely to engage in further acts of sexually predatory conduct.
III. The District Court did not err when it found G.R.H. has "a significant problem" controlling his behavior and such finding should be synonymous with a finding of "serious difficulty" controlling behavior.
|Add Docket 20100114 RSS|
|1||04/08/2010||NOTICE OF APPEAL: 04/08/2010|
|2||04/08/2010||ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT: 04/08/2010|
|4||05/07/2010||TRANSCRIPT DATED JANUARY 6, 2010, & C.O.S.|
|5||05/11/2010||RECORD ON APPEAL (3 VOLUMES) & SEPARATES.|
|6||06/11/2010||MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLANT BRIEF|
|7||06/11/2010||ACTION BY DEPUTY CLERK (MAT). Granted: 07/16/2010|
|8||07/13/2010||APPELLANT BRIEF (e-filed)|
|9||07/13/2010||E-FILED BRIEF (ATA)|
|11||07/14/2010||Received $25 e-filing surcharge for ATB (Receipt #19715).|
|12||07/19/2010||Received 8 copies of corrected title page.|
|13||07/21/2010||Received 7 copies of ATB from Central Duplicating.|
|14||08/11/2010||MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLEE BRIEF|
|15||08/11/2010||ACTION BY DEPUTY CLERK ON BEHALF OF CLERK. Granted: 09/13/2010|
|18||09/20/2010||Received 8 copies of corrected title page for AEB.|
|19||10/18/2010||NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT|
|20||10/21/2010||Request to waive oral argument on behalf of the Appellant|
|21||10/21/2010||E-FILED MOTION (Request to waive)|
|22||10/25/2010||ACTION BY SUPREME COURT (Request to waive on behalf of Appellant). Granted|
|23||10/26/2010||Request to waive oral argument on behalf of Appellee|
|24||10/26/2010||E-FILED MOTION (request to waive on behalf of Appellee)|
|25||10/26/2010||ACTION BY SUPREME COURT (request to waive on behalf of Appellee). Granted|
|26||11/03/2010||APPEARANCES:Argument waived under N.D.R.App.P. 34(f)|
|29||02/08/2011||SPLIT OPINION: Sandstrom, Dale V.|
|30||02/08/2011||DISSENT: Kapsner, Carol Ronning: DISSENT|
|31||02/09/2011||Judgment Sent to Parties|
|33||03/09/2011||RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE|
|34||04/07/2011||Corrected/Substitute Opinion Page|