Doll v. Doll

20100133 Sarah A. Doll, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Andrew D. Doll, Defendant and Appellant

Appeal from: District Court, East Central Judicial District, Cass County
Judge Steven E. McCullough
Nature of Action: Child Cust & Support (Div.\other)
Counsel:
Appellant: Craig Mark Richie
Appellee: Timothy P. Hill
Term: 12/2010   Argument: 12/17/2010  10:00am
ND cite: 2011 ND 24
NW cite: 794 N.W.2d 425

Listen to recording of oral argument in MP3 format

Issues: Appellant's Statement of the Issues:
A. Did the trial court err by giving undue weight to one interest factor pursuant to N.D.C.C. 14-09-06.2, and also by failing to consider all best interest factors under the law?
B. Did the trial court err by failing to consider Sarah had caused a frustration of Andy's visitation, as well as alienated the children against their father?
C. Did the trial court err by failing to consider Sarah's chronic instability and dishonesty towards the authorities, her children, and ex-husband?
D. Did the trial court err by failing to consider how Sarah's chronic lying, dishonesty, multiple relationships, and manipulation discredited her moral fitness as a parent?

Appellee's Statement of the Issues:
The district court awarded primary physical custody to Sarah with liberal visitation to Andy. The parties were awarded joint legal custody. Andy is disputing the physical custody determination and states that the district court erred in awarding primary physical custody to Sarah.

Add Docket 20100133 RSS Add Docket 20100133 RSS

Docket entries:
105/10/2010 NOTICE OF APPEAL: 05/07/2010
206/09/2010 ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT: 05/13/2010
306/09/2010 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL (1-216)
406/11/2010 notice from Catherine Jorgensen that preparation of transcript was suspended for failure to pay
506/11/2010 e-mail from Catherine Jorgensen acknowledging advance payment of TRA
607/01/2010 MOT. EXT/TIME TRANSCRIPT
707/01/2010 ACTION BY TRIAL COURT. Granted: 07/19/2010
807/19/2010 TRANSCRIPT DATED 2/8/10, 2/9/10 & 2/10/10 & C.O.S.
907/19/2010 DISK-tra (2/8/10, 2/9/10 & 2/10/10) e-mailed
1007/21/2010 Amended Certificate of Service of Copies of Transcripts
1108/27/2010 APPELLANT BRIEF (See replacement ATB filed 9-3-10)
1208/27/2010 APPELLANT APPENDIX
1309/03/2010 APPELLANT BRIEF (corrected)
1409/03/2010 DISK - atb (E-mailed)
1509/07/2010 Copy of Order dated 4-28-10 for ATA
1609/28/2010 MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLEE BRIEF
1709/29/2010 ACTION BY CLERK. Granted: 10/18/2010
1810/15/2010 APPELLEE BRIEF (e-filed)
1910/15/2010 E-FILED BRIEF (AEB)
2010/15/2010 APPELLEE APPENDIX (e-filed)
2110/15/2010 E-FILED APPENDIX (AEA)
2210/19/2010 Received $25 surcharge for AEB (Receipt #20023)
2310/20/2010 Received 7 copies of AEB from CSD
2410/20/2010 Received 6 copies of AEA from CSD
2511/16/2010 NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT
2612/17/2010 APPEARANCES: Craig M. Richie; Timothy P. Hill
2712/17/2010 ARGUED: Craig M. Richie; Timothy P. Hill
2812/17/2010 ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST
2902/08/2011 DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED
3002/08/2011 UNANIMOUS OPINION: Maring, Mary Muehlen
3102/08/2011 (CONCUR IN THE RESULT): Sandstrom, Dale V.: CON/RES
3202/08/2011 Costs on Appeal taxed in favor of Appellee
3302/09/2011 Judgment Sent to Parties
3403/08/2011 MANDATE
3503/11/2011 RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE

Generated from Supreme Court Docket on 09/19/2014