Doll v. Doll | |||||||
| 20100133 |
Sarah A. Doll, Plaintiff and Appellee
v. Andrew D. Doll, Defendant and Appellant | ||||||
| Appeal from: |
District Court,
East Central Judicial District,
Cass County
Judge Steven E. McCullough | ||||||
| Nature of Action: | Child Cust & Support (Div.\other) | ||||||
| Counsel: |
| ||||||
| Term: | 12/2010  Argument: 12/17/2010 10:00am | ||||||
| ND cite: | 2011 ND 24 | ||||||
| NW cite: |
794 N.W.2d 425
Listen to recording of oral argument using RealPlayer Basic,© a free download. | ||||||
|
| |||||||
| Issues: |
Appellant's Statement of the Issues: A. Did the trial court err by giving undue weight to one interest factor pursuant to N.D.C.C. 14-09-06.2, and also by failing to consider all best interest factors under the law? B. Did the trial court err by failing to consider Sarah had caused a frustration of Andy's visitation, as well as alienated the children against their father? C. Did the trial court err by failing to consider Sarah's chronic instability and dishonesty towards the authorities, her children, and ex-husband? D. Did the trial court err by failing to consider how Sarah's chronic lying, dishonesty, multiple relationships, and manipulation discredited her moral fitness as a parent? Appellee's Statement of the Issues: The district court awarded primary physical custody to Sarah with liberal visitation to Andy. The parties were awarded joint legal custody. Andy is disputing the physical custody determination and states that the district court erred in awarding primary physical custody to Sarah. | ||||||
|
| |||||||
| 1 | 05/10/2010 | NOTICE OF APPEAL: 05/07/2010 | ||
| 2 | 06/09/2010 | ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT: 05/13/2010 | ||
| 3 | 06/09/2010 | ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL (1-216) | ||
| 4 | 06/11/2010 | notice from Catherine Jorgensen that preparation of transcript was suspended for failure to pay | ||
| 5 | 06/11/2010 | e-mail from Catherine Jorgensen acknowledging advance payment of TRA | ||
| 6 | 07/01/2010 | MOT. EXT/TIME TRANSCRIPT | ||
| 7 | 07/01/2010 | ACTION BY TRIAL COURT. Granted: 07/19/2010 | ||
| 8 | 07/19/2010 | TRANSCRIPT DATED 2/8/10, 2/9/10 & 2/10/10 & C.O.S. | ||
| 9 | 07/19/2010 | DISK-tra (2/8/10, 2/9/10 & 2/10/10) e-mailed | ||
| 10 | 07/21/2010 | Amended Certificate of Service of Copies of Transcripts | ||
| 11 | 08/27/2010 | APPELLANT BRIEF (See replacement ATB filed 9-3-10) | ||
| 12 | 08/27/2010 | APPELLANT APPENDIX | ||
| 13 | 09/03/2010 | APPELLANT BRIEF (corrected) | ||
| 14 | 09/03/2010 | DISK - atb (E-mailed) | ||
| 15 | 09/07/2010 | Copy of Order dated 4-28-10 for ATA | ||
| 16 | 09/28/2010 | MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLEE BRIEF | ||
| 17 | 09/29/2010 | ACTION BY CLERK. Granted: 10/18/2010 | ||
| 18 | 10/15/2010 | APPELLEE BRIEF (e-filed) | ||
| 19 | 10/15/2010 | E-FILED BRIEF (AEB) | ||
| 20 | 10/15/2010 | APPELLEE APPENDIX (e-filed) | ||
| 21 | 10/15/2010 | E-FILED APPENDIX (AEA) | ||
| 22 | 10/19/2010 | Received $25 surcharge for AEB (Receipt #20023) | ||
| 23 | 10/20/2010 | Received 7 copies of AEB from CSD | ||
| 24 | 10/20/2010 | Received 6 copies of AEA from CSD | ||
| 25 | 11/16/2010 | NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT | ||
| 26 | 12/17/2010 | APPEARANCES: Craig M. Richie; Timothy P. Hill | ||
| 27 | 12/17/2010 | ARGUED: Craig M. Richie; Timothy P. Hill | ||
| 28 | 12/17/2010 | ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST | ||
| 29 | 02/08/2011 | DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED | ||
| 30 | 02/08/2011 | UNANIMOUS OPINION: Maring, Mary Muehlen | ||
| 31 | 02/08/2011 | (CONCUR IN THE RESULT): Sandstrom, Dale V.: CON/RES | ||
| 32 | 02/08/2011 | Costs on Appeal taxed in favor of Appellee | ||
| 33 | 02/09/2011 | Judgment Sent to Parties | ||
| 34 | 03/08/2011 | MANDATE | ||
| 35 | 03/11/2011 | RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE |