Interest of M.G.
In the Interest of M.G., a Child
Stuart Larson, Traill County
States Attorney, Petitioner and Appellee
S.M., Respondent and Appellant
Director, Traill County Social
Services, T.G., M.G., and
Cynthia Kesler, Lay Guardian
ad Litem, Respondents
East Central Judicial District,
Judge Steven L. Marquart
|Nature of Action:||Termination/Parental Rights|
|Term:||08/2010  Argument: 08/03/2010 10:30am|
|ND cite:||2010 ND 157|
786 N.W.2d 710
Listen to recording of oral argument in MP3 format
Appellant's Statement of the Issues:|
I. Whether there was clear and convincing evidence to support a finding of deprivation that was likely to continue.
II. Whether there was clear and convincing evidence that the child would likely suffer harm absent a termination of parental rights.
III. Whether there was clear and convincing evidence that reasonable efforts were made to prevent the continued placement of the child outside of the parental home.
Appellee's Statement of the Issues:
I.Whether the petitioner established through clear and convincing evidence termination of parental rights is justified under N.D.C.C. 27-20-44. 1.Was the child a "Deprived Child"? 2.Is the deprivation likely to continue? 3.Will there be harm to the child?
II.Whether the District Court Judge erred in the review and in affirming the Juvenile Referee's decision.
III.Whether reasonable efforts were made to prevent removal and to reunify.
|Add Docket 20100207 RSS|
|1||07/02/2010||NOTICE OF APPEAL: 07/02/2010|
|3||07/02/2010||APPELLANT BRIEF (e-filed)|
|4||07/02/2010||E-FILED BRIEF (ATB)|
|5||07/02/2010||APPELLANT APPENDIX (e-filed)|
|6||07/02/2010||E-FILED APPENDIX (ATA)|
|7||07/07/2010||MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLEE BRIEF (sua sponte pursuant to Rule 2.2)|
|8||07/07/2010||ACTION BY CLERK (MAE) (sua sponte pursuant to Rule 2.2). Granted: 07/19/2010|
|9||07/07/2010||Received $25 surcharge for ATB (Receipt #19706)|
|10||07/08/2010||Notice of Filing Notice of Appeal|
|11||07/08/2010||Digital Recordings DATED 2/25/09, 4/29/09, 12/31/09, 7/28/09, 1/28/10, 3/25/10, 5/14/10 & C.O.S.|
|12||07/09/2010||Received 7 copies of ATB from CSD|
|13||07/09/2010||Received 6 copies of ATA from CSD|
|14||07/14/2010||NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT|
|15||07/14/2010||RECORD ON APPEAL (Electronic)|
|16||07/15/2010||APPELLEE BRIEF (e-filed)|
|17||07/15/2010||E-FILED BRIEF (AEB)|
|18||07/15/2010||APPELLEE APPENDIX (e-filed) PDF|
|19||07/15/2010||E-FILED APPENDIX (AEA) PDF|
|20||07/16/2010||Received $25 e-filing surcharge for AEB (Receipt #19720).|
|21||07/16/2010||Corrected cover page & pages 2 & 3 for the Appellant's Brief|
|22||08/03/2010||APPEARANCES: Douglas W. Nesheim/Stuart A. Larson, State's Attorney|
|24||08/03/2010||ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST|
|26||08/17/2010||UNANIMOUS OPINION: Sandstrom, Dale V.|
|27||08/19/2010||Judgment Sent to Parties|
|29||09/24/2010||RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE|