Interest of M.G.
In the Interest of M.G., a Child
Stuart Larson, Traill County
States Attorney, Petitioner and Appellee
S.M., Respondent and Appellant
Director, Traill County Social
Services, T.G., M.G., and
Cynthia Kesler, Lay Guardian
ad Litem, Respondents
East Central Judicial District,
Judge Steven L. Marquart
|Nature of Action:||Termination/Parental Rights|
|Term:||08/2010  Argument: 08/03/2010|
|ND cite:||2010 ND 157|
786 N.W.2d 710
Listen to recording of oral argument in MP3 format
Appellant's Statement of the Issues:|
I. Whether there was clear and convincing evidence to support a finding of deprivation that was likely to continue.
II. Whether there was clear and convincing evidence that the child would likely suffer harm absent a termination of parental rights.
III. Whether there was clear and convincing evidence that reasonable efforts were made to prevent the continued placement of the child outside of the parental home.
Appellee's Statement of the Issues:
I.Whether the petitioner established through clear and convincing evidence termination of parental rights is justified under N.D.C.C. 27-20-44. 1.Was the child a "Deprived Child"? 2.Is the deprivation likely to continue? 3.Will there be harm to the child?
II.Whether the District Court Judge erred in the review and in affirming the Juvenile Referee's decision.
III.Whether reasonable efforts were made to prevent removal and to reunify.
|Add Docket 20100207 RSS|
|1||07/02/2010 NOTICE OF APPEAL: 07/02/2010|
|3||07/02/2010 APPELLANT BRIEF (e-filed)|
|4||07/02/2010 E-FILED BRIEF (ATB)|
|5||07/02/2010 APPELLANT APPENDIX (e-filed)|
|6||07/02/2010 E-FILED APPENDIX (ATA)|
|7||07/07/2010 MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLEE BRIEF (sua sponte pursuant to Rule 2.2)|
|8||07/07/2010 ACTION BY CLERK (MAE) (sua sponte pursuant to Rule 2.2). Granted: 07/19/2010|
|9||07/07/2010 Received $25 surcharge for ATB (Receipt #19706)|
|10||07/08/2010 Notice of Filing Notice of Appeal|
|11||07/08/2010 Digital Recordings DATED 2/25/09, 4/29/09, 12/31/09, 7/28/09, 1/28/10, 3/25/10, 5/14/10 & C.O.S.|
|12||07/09/2010 Received 7 copies of ATB from CSD|
|13||07/09/2010 Received 6 copies of ATA from CSD|
|14||07/14/2010 NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT|
|15||07/14/2010 RECORD ON APPEAL (Electronic)|
|16||07/15/2010 APPELLEE BRIEF (e-filed)|
|17||07/15/2010 E-FILED BRIEF (AEB)|
|18||07/15/2010 APPELLEE APPENDIX (e-filed) PDF|
|19||07/15/2010 E-FILED APPENDIX (AEA) PDF|
|20||07/16/2010 Received $25 e-filing surcharge for AEB (Receipt #19720).|
|21||07/16/2010 Corrected cover page & pages 2 & 3 for the Appellant's Brief|
|22||08/03/2010 APPEARANCES: Douglas W. Nesheim/Stuart A. Larson, State's Attorney|
|23||08/03/2010 ARGUED: Nesheim/Larson|
|24||08/03/2010 ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST|
|25||08/17/2010 DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED|
|26||08/17/2010 UNANIMOUS OPINION: Sandstrom, Dale V.|
|27||08/19/2010 Judgment Sent to Parties|
|29||09/24/2010 RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE|