Glass v. Glass

20100260 Julie E. Glass, Plaintiff and Appellant
v.
Darin M. Glass, Defendant and Appellee

Appeal from: District Court, South Central Judicial District, Burleigh County
Judge Bruce A. Romanick
Nature of Action: Child Cust & Support (Div.\other)
Counsel:
Appellant: Brenda A. Neubauer
Appellee: Suzanne Marie Schweigert
Appellee: Stacy Mae Moldenhauer
Term: 03/2011   Argument: 03/17/2011  9:30am
ND cite: 2011 ND 145
NW cite: 800 N.W.2d 691

Listen to recording of oral argument in MP3 format

Issues: Appellant's Statement of the Issues:
1.The trial court erred in removing the children from their mother, their custodial home for the past five and a half years, and placing them in the residential responsibility of their father.
2.The trial court failed to conduct the two-step analysis required in change of custody proceedings. a.Whether or not there has been a significant change of circumstances since the original custody award. b.If so, whether or not those changed circumstances are such that a change in custody fosters the best interests of the child.
3.The trial court denied Julie's request for continuance after custody investigator's report was received less than 30 days prior to the evidentiary hearing.

Add Docket 20100260 RSS Add Docket 20100260 RSS

Docket entries:
108/06/2010 NOTICE OF APPEAL: 08/05/2010
208/06/2010 ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT: 08/05/2010
308/16/2010 ANNOUNCED DISQUALIFICATION: Crothers, Daniel John
408/25/2010 MOTION FOR Stay & Appendix in Support
508/26/2010 ACTION BY SUPREME COURT. Denied
608/27/2010 Order Sent to Parties (email)
709/24/2010 TRANSCRIPTS DATED 06/22/10 - 06/24/10 & C.O.S.
809/24/2010 DISK - TRA (e-mailed)
909/27/2010 RECORD ON APPEAL and Separates (entry nos. 93, 122, 123, & 125)
1010/27/2010 MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLANT BRIEF (faxed)
1110/27/2010 E-FILED MOTION (MAT) faxed
1210/27/2010 ACTION BY CLERK (MAT). Granted: 12/03/2010
1311/03/2010 MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLEE BRIEF
1411/03/2010 E-FILED MOTION (MAE)
1511/03/2010 ACTION BY CLERK. Granted: 02/02/2011
1612/02/2010 MOTION FOR Enlargement of Word Limits
1712/03/2010 NO ACTION TAKEN (motion for enlargement of word limit)
1812/03/2010 APPELLANT BRIEF
1912/03/2010 APPELLANT APPENDIX
2012/03/2010 DISK-ATB (E-MAILED)
2102/02/2011 APPELLEE BRIEF (e-filed) PDF
2202/02/2011 E-FILED BRIEF (AEB) PDF
2302/02/2011 APPELLEE APPENDIX (e-filed) PDF
2402/02/2011 E-FILED APPENDIX (AEA) PDF
2502/03/2011 Received $25 surcharge for AEB & $14 surcharge for AEA (Receipt #20160).
2602/07/2011 Received 7 copies of AEB from Central Duplicating.
2702/07/2011 Received 6 copies of AEA from Central Duplicating.
2802/07/2011 Received additional $1.50 surcharge for AEA (Receipt #20172).
2902/07/2011 MOT. EXT/TIME REPLY BRIEF (e-mailed)
3002/07/2011 E-FILED MOTION (Mot/Ext/RYB)
3102/08/2011 ACTION BY CLERK (RYB). Granted: 03/02/2011
3202/15/2011 NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT
3302/18/2011 SITTING WITH THE COURT: Goodman, Ronald E.
3403/02/2011 REPLY BRIEF of Appellant
3503/02/2011 DISK - ryb (e-mailed)
3603/17/2011 APPEARANCES: Brenda Neubauer; Suzanne Schweigert
3703/17/2011 ARGUED: Neubauer; Schweigert
3803/17/2011 ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST
3907/15/2011 DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED
4007/15/2011 SPLIT OPINION: Sandstrom, Dale V.
4107/15/2011 (CONCURRING IN PART OR DISSENTING IN PART): Maring, Mary Muehlen: CON/DIS
4207/15/2011 Costs on appeal taxed in favor of appellee
4307/15/2011 Judgment Sent to Parties
4408/12/2011 MANDATE
4508/16/2011 RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE
4609/20/2011 Corrected/Substitute Opinion pages 11 & 12

Generated from Supreme Court Docket on 10/23/2014