Krueger v. Krueger

20100264 Debra Krueger, n/k/a
Deborah Bentz, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Gregory Krueger, Defendant and Appellant

Appeal from: District Court, Southwest Judicial District, Stark County
Judge Harlan Patrick Weir
Nature of Action: Child Cust & Support (Div.\other)
Counsel:
Appellant: Kent M. Morrow
Appellee: Diane Fabel Melbye
Appellee: Rhonda Rae Ehlis
Term: 04/2011   Argument: 04/05/2011  9:30am
ND cite: 2011 ND 134
NW cite: 800 N.W.2d 296

Listen to recording of oral argument in MP3 format

Issues: Appellant's Statement of the Issues:
Did the trial court err when it determined that the "wishes" of LIK to not have visitation with Gregory was sufficient to deny the Motion To Amend Judgment?
Did the trial court err in its determination of determination of Greg's child support obligation?

Appellee's Statement of the Issues:
I: Was the district court's decision on visitation concerning a 16 , now 17 year old young man clearly erroneous?
II: Did the Court commit reversible error by modifying Gregory Krueger's child support obligation?

Appellee's Statement of the Issues:
Whether the District Court erred in its determination of Gregory Krueger's child support obligation?
Add Docket 20100264 RSS Add Docket 20100264 RSS

Docket entries:
108/09/2010 NOTICE OF APPEAL: 08/05/2010
208/09/2010 ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT: 08/05/2010
309/21/2010 RETENTION OF RECORD ON APPEAL: pending completion of transcript: 10/29/2010
409/27/2010 MOT. EXT/TIME TRANSCRIPT
509/27/2010 ACTION BY TRIAL COURT. Granted: 10/29/2010
610/28/2010 TRANSCRIPTS DATED March 10, 2010 & May 10, 2010 (2 volumes) & C.O.S.
710/28/2010 DISK - tra (3/10/10 & 5/10/10) (e-mailed)
811/02/2010 RECORD ON APPEAL (3 volumes) and Separate (Entry No. 109A).
911/29/2010 MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLANT BRIEF (e-filed)
1011/29/2010 E-FILED MOTION (MAT)
1111/29/2010 ACTION BY CLERK (MAT). Granted: 01/06/2011
1201/03/2011 APPELLANT BRIEF (e-filed)
1301/03/2011 E-FILED BRIEF (ATB)
1401/03/2011 APPELLANT APPENDIX (e-filed)
1501/03/2011 E-FILED APPENDIX (ata)
1601/04/2011 Received $25 surcharge for atb (Receipt #20120)
1701/06/2011 Received 7 copies of ATB from CSD
1801/06/2011 Received 6 copies of ATA from CSD
1901/25/2011 MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLEE BRIEF (e-filed)(faxed)
2001/25/2011 E-FILED MOTION (MAE) (faxed)
2101/25/2011 ACTION BY CLERK (MAE). Granted: 03/04/2011
2201/27/2011 MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL OF THE APPELLANT (e-filed). RspDue: 02/09/2011
2301/27/2011 E-FILED MOTION (Mot./Dismiss)
2401/28/2011 Response Filed to Motion to Dismiss
2501/28/2011 EFILED RESPONSE
2602/02/2011 ACTION BY SUPREME COURT. Denied
2702/02/2011 Order/Judgment Sent to Parties
2802/02/2011 MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLEE BRIEF (Southwest Area Child Support Enforcement Unit)
2902/02/2011 ACTION BY SUPREME COURT (sua sponte - MAE). Granted: 03/19/2011
3002/02/2011 Appellee, Krueger, brief due March 4, 2011
3103/02/2011 APPELLEE BRIEF (e-filed)
3203/02/2011 E-FILED BRIEF (AEB)
3303/07/2011 Receipt for $25.00 AEB e-file surcharge. (receipt no. 20210)
3403/09/2011 Rec'd 7 copies of AEB (Krueger) back from Central Duplicating.
3503/17/2011 APPELLEE BRIEF (CHILD SUPPORT)
3603/17/2011 APPELLEE APPENDIX (CHILD SUPPORT)
3703/18/2011 DISK-AEB (CHILD SUPPORT) CD-ROM
3803/22/2011 NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT
3904/05/2011 APPEARANCES: Kent A. Morrow; Diane F. Melbye; and Rhonda R. Ehlis, Spec. Asst. Attny. General
4004/05/2011 ARGUED: Morrow; Melbye; Ehlis
4104/05/2011 ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST
4207/13/2011 DISPOSITION (AND REMANDED): AFFIRMED/PT, REVERSED/PT
4307/13/2011 SPLIT OPINION: Sandstrom, Dale V.
4407/13/2011 (CONCUR IN THE RESULT): Crothers, Daniel John: CON/RES
4507/13/2011 (CONCURRING IN PART AND DISSENTING IN PART): Kapsner, Carol Ronning: CON/DIS
4607/13/2011 (JOINED IN CONCURRING IN PART AND DISSENTING IN PART): Maring, Mary Muehlen: JN/CON
4707/13/2011 Neither party shall have and recover costs on appeal
4807/14/2011 Judgment Sent to Parties
4908/09/2011 MANDATE
5008/11/2011 RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE
5109/21/2011 Corrected Opinion Pages 3 & 5

Generated from Supreme Court Docket on 12/18/2014