Krueger v. Krueger
|
| 20100264 |
Debra Krueger, n/k/a
Deborah Bentz, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Gregory Krueger, Defendant and Appellant
|
| Appeal from: |
District Court,
Southwest Judicial District,
Stark County
Judge Harlan Patrick Weir |
|
Nature of Action: |
Child Cust & Support (Div.\other)
|
| Counsel: |
|
| Term: |
04/2011 Argument: 04/05/2011 09:30am
|
| ND cite: |
2011 ND 134
|
| NW cite: |
800 N.W.2d 296
Listen to recording of oral argument
using RealPlayer Basic,© a free download.
|
|
|
| Issues: |
Appellant's Statement of the Issues:
Did the trial court err when it determined that the "wishes" of LIK to not have visitation with Gregory was sufficient to deny the Motion To Amend Judgment?
Did the trial court err in its determination of determination of Greg's child support obligation?
Appellee's Statement of the Issues:
I: Was the district court's decision on visitation concerning a 16 « , now 17 year old young man clearly erroneous?
II: Did the Court commit reversible error by modifying Gregory Krueger's child support obligation?
Appellee's Statement of the Issues:
Whether the District Court erred in its determination of Gregory Krueger's child
support obligation?
|
|
 Add Docket 20100264 RSS
|
| 1 | | 08/09/2010 | |
NOTICE OF APPEAL: 08/05/2010 |
| 2 | | 08/09/2010 | |
ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT: 08/05/2010 |
| 3 | | 09/21/2010 | |
RETENTION OF RECORD ON APPEAL: pending completion of transcript: 10/29/2010 |
| 4 | | 09/27/2010 | |
MOT. EXT/TIME TRANSCRIPT |
| 5 | | 09/27/2010 | |
ACTION BY TRIAL COURT. Granted: 10/29/2010 |
| 6 | | 10/28/2010 | |
TRANSCRIPTS DATED March 10, 2010 & May 10, 2010 (2 volumes) & C.O.S. |
| 7 | | 10/28/2010 | |
DISK - tra (3/10/10 & 5/10/10) (e-mailed) |
| 8 | | 11/02/2010 | |
RECORD ON APPEAL (3 volumes) and Separate (Entry No. 109A). |
| 9 | | 11/29/2010 | |
MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLANT BRIEF (e-filed) |
| 10 | | 11/29/2010 | |
E-FILED MOTION (MAT) |
| 11 | | 11/29/2010 | |
ACTION BY CLERK (MAT). Granted: 01/06/2011 |
| 12 | | 01/03/2011 | |
APPELLANT BRIEF (e-filed) |
| 13 | | 01/03/2011 | |
E-FILED BRIEF (ATB) |
| 14 | | 01/03/2011 | |
APPELLANT APPENDIX (e-filed) |
| 15 | | 01/03/2011 | |
E-FILED APPENDIX (ata) |
| 16 | | 01/04/2011 | |
Received $25 surcharge for atb (Receipt #20120) |
| 17 | | 01/06/2011 | |
Received 7 copies of ATB from CSD |
| 18 | | 01/06/2011 | |
Received 6 copies of ATA from CSD |
| 19 | | 01/25/2011 | |
MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLEE BRIEF (e-filed)(faxed) |
| 20 | | 01/25/2011 | |
E-FILED MOTION (MAE) (faxed) |
| 21 | | 01/25/2011 | |
ACTION BY CLERK (MAE). Granted: 03/04/2011 |
| 22 | | 01/27/2011 | |
MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL OF THE APPELLANT (e-filed). RspDue: 02/09/2011 |
| 23 | | 01/27/2011 | |
E-FILED MOTION (Mot./Dismiss) |
| 24 | | 01/28/2011 | |
Response Filed to Motion to Dismiss |
| 25 | | 01/28/2011 | |
EFILED RESPONSE |
| 26 | | 02/02/2011 | |
ACTION BY SUPREME COURT. Denied |
| 27 | | 02/02/2011 | |
Order/Judgment Sent to Parties |
| 28 | | 02/02/2011 | |
MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLEE BRIEF (Southwest Area Child Support Enforcement Unit) |
| 29 | | 02/02/2011 | |
ACTION BY SUPREME COURT (sua sponte - MAE). Granted: 03/19/2011 |
| 30 | | 02/02/2011 | |
Appellee, Krueger, brief due March 4, 2011 |
| 31 | | 03/02/2011 | |
APPELLEE BRIEF (e-filed) |
| 32 | | 03/02/2011 | |
E-FILED BRIEF (AEB) |
| 33 | | 03/07/2011 | |
Receipt for $25.00 AEB e-file surcharge. (receipt no. 20210) |
| 34 | | 03/09/2011 | |
Rec'd 7 copies of AEB (Krueger) back from Central Duplicating. |
| 35 | | 03/17/2011 | |
APPELLEE BRIEF (CHILD SUPPORT) |
| 36 | | 03/17/2011 | |
APPELLEE APPENDIX (CHILD SUPPORT) |
| 37 | | 03/18/2011 | |
DISK-AEB (CHILD SUPPORT) CD-ROM |
| 38 | | 03/22/2011 | |
NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT |
| 39 | | 04/05/2011 | |
APPEARANCES: Kent A. Morrow; Diane F. Melbye; and Rhonda R. Ehlis, Spec. Asst. Attny. General |
| 40 | | 04/05/2011 | |
ARGUED: Morrow; Melbye; Ehlis |
| 41 | | 04/05/2011 | |
ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST |
| 42 | | 07/13/2011 | |
DISPOSITION (AND REMANDED): AFFIRMED/PT, REVERSED/PT |
| 43 | | 07/13/2011 | |
SPLIT OPINION: Sandstrom, Dale V. |
| 44 | | 07/13/2011 | |
(CONCUR IN THE RESULT): Crothers, Daniel John: CON/RES |
| 45 | | 07/13/2011 | |
(CONCURRING IN PART AND DISSENTING IN PART): Kapsner, Carol Ronning: CON/DIS |
| 46 | | 07/13/2011 | |
(JOINED IN CONCURRING IN PART AND DISSENTING IN PART): Maring, Mary Muehlen: JN/CON |
| 47 | | 07/13/2011 | |
Neither party shall have and recover costs on appeal |
| 48 | | 07/14/2011 | |
Judgment Sent to Parties |
| 49 | | 08/09/2011 | |
MANDATE |
| 50 | | 08/11/2011 | |
RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE |
| 51 | | 09/21/2011 | |
Corrected Opinion Pages 3 & 5 |