Wolt v. Wolt
Kathy Wolt, Plaintiff and Appellee
Steve Wolt, Defendant and Appellant
South Central Judicial District,
Judge Gail Hagerty
|Nature of Action:||Child Cust & Support (Div.\other)|
|Term:||01/2011  Argument: 01/13/2011|
|ND cite:||2011 ND 170|
803 N.W.2d 534
Listen to recording of oral argument in MP3 format
Appellant's Statement of the Issues:|
A. Did the trial court err as a matter of law in failing to allow an evidentiary hearing in this matter?
B. Did the trial court err as a matter of law in failing to allow a requested motion hearing?
C. Did the trial court err as a matter of law in sanctioning the appellant for brining his motions in the lower court?
D. Did the trial court err as a matter of law in failing to allow relief from the original order based upon N.D.R.Civ.P. Rule 60?
Appellee's Statement of the Issues:
A. The District Court did not err as a matter of law when it denied Steve's request for an evidentiary hearing because Steve failed to establish a prima facia case entitling him to an evidentiary hearing.
B. The District Court did not err when it denied Steve's request for a hearing on his Motion to Modify Judgment regarding parenting time.
C. The District Court properly awarded Kathy $1,000 in attorney's fees as a sanction for Steve bringing a frivolous motion.
D. The District Court properly denied Steve's Motion for Rule 60(b) Relief because no grounds exist to entitle Steve to Relief from Judgment.
E. Kathy is entitled to her attorney's fees for having to respond to this appeal.
|Add Docket 20100294 RSS|
|1||09/14/2010 NOTICE OF APPEAL: 09/10/2010|
|2||09/14/2010 ANNOUNCED DISQUALIFICATION: Sandstrom, Dale V.|
|3||10/05/2010 RECORD ON APPEAL (3 volumes) & Separates, which include exhibits and transcripts (2)|
|4||10/14/2010 APPELLANT BRIEF|
|5||10/14/2010 APPELLANT APPENDIX|
|6||10/14/2010 DISK - ATB|
|7||11/09/2010 MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLEE BRIEF (e-mailed Letter dated 11-9-10)|
|8||11/09/2010 E-FILED MOTION (MAE)|
|9||11/09/2010 ACTION BY CLERK (MAE). Granted: 11/24/2010|
|10||11/24/2010 APPELLEE BRIEF (e-file)|
|11||11/24/2010 E-FILED BRIEF (AEB)|
|12||11/24/2010 MOTION and Affidavit for Attorney's Costs|
|13||11/24/2010 ANNOUNCED DISQUALIFICATION: Crothers, Daniel John|
|14||11/26/2010 Rec'd $25.00 AEB electronic filing fee. (receipt no. 20073)|
|15||11/29/2010 Rec'd 7 copies of AEB back from Central Duplicating.|
|16||12/13/2010 NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT|
|17||12/17/2010 SITTING WITH THE COURT: Dawson, Georgia|
|18||12/20/2010 SITTING WITH THE COURT: Olson, Everett Nels|
|19||01/13/2011 APPEARANCES: Justin Hager/Suzanne Schweigert|
|20||01/13/2011 ARGUED: Hager/Schweigert|
|21||01/13/2011 ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST|
|22||08/26/2011 ACTION BY SUPREME COURT (Motion for attorney costs). Denied|
|23||08/26/2011 DISPOSITION (Affirmed in part, Reversed in part, and Remanded): AFFIRMED/PT, REVERSED/PT|
|24||08/26/2011 UNANIMOUS OPINION: VandeWalle, Gerald W.|
|25||08/26/2011 Neither party have and recover costs and disbursements in this appeal|
|26||08/29/2011 Judgment Sent to Parties|
|28||09/22/2011 RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE|