Locken v. Locken
v.
Loren Locken as Trustee of the
Virgil and Marjorie Locken Family
Trust under the Trust Agreement
dated December 27, 2002; Jon Locken
and Loren Locken as Co-Personal
Representatives of the Marjorie Locken
Estate; Jon Locken and Loren Locken, as
Co-Personal Representatives of the
Virgil K. Locken Estate; Jon Locken, Inc.;
Loren W. Locken, Inc.; Jon Locken;
Loren Locken; Bernard Vculek as Trustee of
the Bernard L. Vculek Revocable Trust;
Marlene Vculek as Trustee of the Marlene
Vculek Revocable Trust; and the unknown
spouses, the unknown heirs, administrators,
executors, successors, devisees, legatees,
assigns and personal representatives of any
kind of all of the above named defendants,
and all other persons unknown claiming any
rights, title or interest in, or lien or
encumberance upon the property described
in the Complaint, Defendants and Appellees
Judge John E. Greenwood
| Appellant: | Sara Kaye Sorenson | |
| Appellee: | Michael D. McNair |
Listen to recording of oral argument
using RealPlayer Basic,© a free download.
Does the term "due date," as that term is used in N.D.C.C. 28-01-42, mean the date the last payment on the contract for deed was due, or does it mean the date the last payment was actually paid?
Appellee's Statement of the Issues:
1. Does the term "due date," as that term is used in N.D.C.C. 28-01-42, mean the date the last payment on the Contract for Deed was due, or does it mean the date the last payment was actually paid?
2. Does N.D.C.C. 28-01-15(2) prohibit David Locken's claim?
Add Docket 20100297 RSS