State v. Erhart

20100384 State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Aaron James Erhart,
a/k/a Aaron James Erhardt, Defendant and Appellant

Appeal from: District Court, South Central Judicial District, Morton County
Judge Thomas J. Schneider
Nature of Action: Sexual Offense
Counsel:
Appellant: Mark Taylor Blumer
Appellee: Jackson John Lofgren , Asst. State's Attorney
Term: 05/2011   Argument: 05/04/2011  10:30am
ND cite: 2011 ND 82
NW cite: 799 N.W.2d 406

Listen to recording of oral argument in MP3 format

Issues: Appellant's Statement of the Issues:
Aaron Erhart's conviction should be reversed because the evidence is insufficient to sustain the guilty verdict.

Appellee's Statement of the Issues:
Whether the evidence was sufficient to support the jury verdict of guilty to the crime of Gross Sexual Imposition?

Add Docket 20100384 RSS Add Docket 20100384 RSS

Docket entries:
112/03/2010 NOTICE OF APPEAL: 12/02/2010
212/03/2010 ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT: 12/02/2010
301/03/2011 Acknowledgment of OTR & RETENTION OF RECORD ON APPEAL: 01/21/2011
401/20/2011 TRANSCRIPTS DATED September 1, 2010, September 2, 2010, & November 30, 2010 & C.O.S.
501/20/2011 DISK - TRA (9/1/10;9/2/10; & 11/30/10) (e-mailed)
601/21/2011 RECORD ON APPEAL & Separate Nos. 28, 46, & 55
702/25/2011 MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLANT BRIEF (e-filed)
802/25/2011 E-FILED MOTION
902/25/2011 ACTION BY CLERK (MAT). Granted: 03/04/2011
1003/04/2011 APPELLANT BRIEF
1103/04/2011 E-FILED BRIEF - ATB
1203/04/2011 APPELLANT APPENDIX
1303/04/2011 E-FILED APPENDIX - ATA
1403/04/2011 Rec'd $25.00 ATB e-file surcharge. (receipt no. 20208)
1503/09/2011 Rec'd 7 copies of ATB back from Central Duplicating.
1603/09/2011 Rec'd 6 copies of ATA back from Central Duplicating.
1703/30/2011 APPELLEE BRIEF
1803/30/2011 DISK of AEB (CD)
1904/18/2011 NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT (see folder)
2005/04/2011 APPEARANCES: Mark T. Blumer/Jackson John Lofgren, Asst. State's Attny.
2105/04/2011 ARGUED: Blumer/Lofgren
2205/04/2011 ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST
2305/11/2011 DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED BY SUMMARY DISP.
2405/11/2011 UNANIMOUS OPINION: Per Curiam
2505/12/2011 Judgment Sent to Parties
2606/06/2011 MANDATE
2706/17/2011 RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE

Generated from Supreme Court Docket on 10/31/2014